Question 1

Is try catch faster than if else?

Accepted Answer

If you've one if/else block instead of one try/catch block, and if an exceptions throws in the try/catch block, then the if/else block is faster (if/else block: around 0.0012 milliseconds, try/catch block: around 0.6664 milliseconds). If no exception is thrown with a try/catch block, then a try/catch block is faster.

Question 2

Is it better to use if else or try catch?

Accepted Answer

You should use if / else to handle all cases you expect. You should not use try {} catch {} to handle everything (in most cases) because a useful Exception could be raised and you can learn about the presence of a bug from it.

Question 3

What is faster if or try?

Accepted Answer

Python3. Now it is clearly seen that the exception handler ( try/except) is comparatively faster than the explicit if condition until it met with an exception. That means If any exception throws, the exception handler took more time than if version of the code.

Question 4

Does Try Catch affect performance?

Accepted Answer

try/catch will only effect performance if an Exception is thrown (but that still isn't because of try/catch , it is because an Exception is being created). try/catch/finally does not add any additional overhead over try/catch .

Which is faster, try catch or if-else in java (WRT performance)

Tags:

java

if-statement

try-catch

Rakesh

People also ask

1 Answers

Mitch Wheat

Recent Activity

Donate For Us