For example, instead of doing
ArrayList<ClassName> variableName;
you do
ArrayList variableName;
then later you add an object of type "ClassName"
variableName.add(objectName);
will that automatically set the type of your array as
ArrayList<ClassName>
?
As elements are added to an ArrayList, its capacity grows automatically. The details of the growth policy are not specified beyond the fact that adding an element has constant amortized time cost.
when you don't specify, it would be the same as if you specified ArrayList<Object>, meaning that any type of object could be added to the ArrayList.
ArrayList maintains the insertion order i.e order of the object in which they are inserted. HashSet is an unordered collection and doesn't maintain any order. ArrayList allows duplicate values in its collection.
No. Generics are for compile time only. You are just losing the benefit of that check. At runtime all generic information is erased
In other words,
ArrayList<Type>
at runtime is just an ArrayList. The benefit of doing that over just a List is that when you are writing your code, the compiler will check that you dont put anything inappropriate in your list.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With