Menu
xargs is widely used in shell scripting; it is usually easy to recast these uses in bash using while read -r; do ... done or while read -ar; do ... done loops.
When should xargs be preferred, and when should while-read loops be preferred?
697
It converts input from standard input into arguments to a command. Some commands such as grep and awk can take input either as command-line arguments or from the standard input. However, others such as cp and echo can only take input as arguments, which is why xargs is necessary.
The xargs utility allows you to build and execute commands from standard input. It is usually used in combination with other commands through piping. With xargs , you can provide standard input as argument to command-line utilities like mkdir and rm .
xargs is a Unix command which can be used to build and execute commands from standard input.
xargs reads items from the standard input, delimited by blanks (which can be protected with double or single quotes or a backslash) or newlines, and executes the command (default is echo) one or more times with any initial-arguments followed by items read from standard input.
The thing with while loops is that they tend to process one item at a time, often when it's unnecessary. This is where xargs has an advantage - it can batch up the arguments to allow one command to process lots of items.
For example, a while loop:
pax> echo '1 2 3 4 5' | while read -r; do echo $REPLY; done 1 2 3 4 5 and the corresponding xargs:
pax> echo '1 2 3 4 5' | xargs echo 1 2 3 4 5 Here you can see that the lines are processed one-by-one with the while and altogether with the xargs. In other words, the former is equivalent to echo 1 ; echo 2 ; echo 3 ; echo 4 ; echo 5 while the latter is equivalent to echo 1 2 3 4 5 (five processes as opposed to one). This really makes a difference when processing thousands or tens of thousands of lines, since process creation takes time.
It's mostly advantageous when using commands that can accept multiple arguments since it reduces the number of individual processes started, making things much faster.
When I'm processing small files or the commands to run on each item are complicated (where I'm too lazy to write a separate script to give to xargs), I will use the while variant.
Where I'm interested in performance (large files), I will use xargs, even if I have to write a separate script.
122
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
