I came across this very similar question but that question is tagged QuickFIX (which is not relevant to my question) and most of the answers are QuickFIX-related.
My question is broader. I'm looking for the most efficient way to parse a FIX Protocol message using C#. By way of background, a FIX message consists of a series of tag/value pairs separated by the ASCII <SOH>
character (0x01). The number of fields in a message is variable.
An example message might look like this:
8=FIX.4.2<SOH>9=175<SOH>35=D<SOH>49=BUY1<SOH>56=SELL1<SOH>34=2482<SOH>50=frg<SOH>
52=20100702-11:12:42<SOH>11=BS01000354924000<SOH>21=3<SOH>100=J<SOH>55=ILA SJ<SOH>
48=YY77<SOH>22=5<SOH>167=CS<SOH>207=J<SOH>54=1<SOH>60=20100702-11:12:42<SOH>
38=500<SOH>40=1<SOH>15=ZAR<SOH>59=0<SOH>10=230<SOH>
For each field, the tag (an integer) and the value (for our purposes, a string) are separated by the '=' character. (The precise semantics of each tag are defined in the protocol, but that isn't particularly germane to this question.)
It's often the case that when doing basic parsing, you are only interested in a handful of specific tags from the FIX header, and not really doing random access to every possible field. Strategies I have considered include:
Using String.Split
, iterating over every element and putting the tag to index mapping in a Hashtable - provides full random-access to all fields if needed at some point
(Slight optimisation) Using String.Split
, scanning the array for tags of interest and putting the tag to index mapping into another container (not necessarily a Hashtable as it may be a fairly small number of items, and the number of items is known prior to parsing)
Scanning the message field by field using String.IndexOf
and storing the offset and length of fields of interest in an appropriate structure
Regarding the first two - although my measurements indicate String.Split
is pretty fast, as per the documentation the method allocates a new String for each element of the resultant array which can generate a lot of garbage if you're parsing a lot of messages. Can anyone see a better way to tackle this problem in .NET?
EDIT:
Three vital pieces of information I left out:
Tags are not necessarily unique within FIX messages, i.e., duplicate tags can occur under certain circumstances.
Certain types of FIX fields can contain 'embedded <SOH>
' in the data - these tags are referred to as being of type 'data' - a dictionary lists the tag numbers that are of this type.
The eventual requirement is to be able to edit the message (particularly replace values).
The assumption is that you are getting these messages either over the wire or you are loading them from disk. In either case, you can access these as a byte array and read the byte array in a forward read manner. If you want want/need/require high performance then parse the byte array yourself (for high performance don't use a dictionary of hashtable of tags and values as this is extremely slow by comparison). Parsing the byte array yourself also means that you can avoid using data you are not interested in and you can optimise the parsing to reflect this.
You should be able to avoid most object allocation easily. You can parse FIX float datatypes to doubles quite easily and very quickly without creating objects (you can outperform double.parse massively with your own version here). The only ones you might need to think about a bit more are tag values that are strings e.g. symbol values in FIX. To avoid creating strings here, you could come up with a simple method of determining a unique int identifier for each each symbol (which is a value type) and this will again help you avoid allocation on the heap.
Customised optimised parsing of the message done properly should easily outperform QuickFix and you can do it all with no garbage collection in .NET or Java.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With