I'm looking at alternatives to -print
or javap
as a way of figuring out what the compiler is doing in Scala. With the new reflection/macros library, reify
seems a good candidate for that, as shown in retronym's macrocosm's desugar
. It even shows how one used to do that, pre-M4.
So the question is, what's the shortest/easiest thing I can type on Scala's REPL to get the AST for an expression, post-Scala 2.10.0-M4?
A lot of things previously defined in package scala.reflect.mirror
have moved to scala.reflect.runtime.universe
:
scala> import scala.reflect.runtime.{universe => u}
import scala.reflect.runtime.{universe=>u}
scala> val expr = u reify { 1 to 3 map (_+1) }
expr: reflect.runtime.universe.Expr[scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int]] = Expr[scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int]](scala.this.Predef.intWrapper(1).to(3).map(((x$1) => x$1.$plus(1)))(immutable.this.IndexedSeq.canBuildFrom))
scala> u show expr.tree
res57: String = scala.this.Predef.intWrapper(1).to(3).map(((x$1) => x$1.$plus(1)))(immutable.this.IndexedSeq.canBuildFrom)
scala> u showRaw expr.tree
res58: String = Apply(Apply(Select(Apply(Select(Apply(Select(Select(This(newTypeName("scala")), newTermName("Predef")), newTermName("intWrapper")), List(Literal(Constant(1)))), newTermName("to")), List(Literal(Constant(3)))), newTermName("map")), List(Function(List(ValDef(Modifiers(<param> <synthetic>), newTermName("x$1"), TypeTree(), EmptyTree)), Apply(Select(Ident(newTermName("x$1")), newTermName("$plus")), List(Literal(Constant(1))))))), List(Select(Select(This(newTypeName("immutable")), newTermName("IndexedSeq")), newTermName("canBuildFrom"))))
Furthermore it is possible to check if a string containing some Scala code is a valid Scala expression and - even better - do some evaluation:
Edit. In 2.10.0-RC1 some methods of ToolBox
have been renamed. parseExpr
is now just parse
, and runExpr
is now called eval
.
scala> import scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox
import scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox
scala> import scala.reflect.runtime.{currentMirror => m}
import scala.reflect.runtime.{currentMirror=>m}
scala> val tb = m.mkToolBox()
tb: scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox[reflect.runtime.universe.type] = scala.tools.reflect.ToolBoxFactory$ToolBoxImpl@9293709
scala> val tree = tb.parse("1 to 3 map (_+1)")
tree: tb.u.Tree = 1.to(3).map(((x$1) => x$1.$plus(1)))
scala> val eval = tb.eval(tree)
eval: Any = Vector(2, 3, 4)
The most complicated thing here is the raw tree representation of an expression. When one wants to use macros, the macros have to be defined the same way as shown by showRaw
. But with some helper methods it is possible to define some not so ugly looking macro implementations:
object IntMacro {
import language.experimental.macros
import scala.reflect.makro.Context
import scala.reflect.NameTransformer.encode
def isEven(i: Int): Boolean = macro isEvenImpl
def isEvenImpl(c: Context)(i: c.Expr[Int]): c.Expr[Boolean] = {
import c.universe._
implicit val cc: c.type = c
val `x = i%2` = Apply(Select(i.tree, op("%")), const(2))
val `x == 0` = Apply(Select(`x = i%2`, op("==")), const(0))
c.Expr(`x == 0`)
}
def op(s: String)(implicit c: Context): c.universe.TermName =
c.universe.newTermName(encode(s))
def const(a: Any)(implicit c: Context): List[c.universe.Literal] =
List(c.universe.Literal(c.universe.Constant(a)))
}
scala> import IntMacro._
import IntMacro._
scala> isEven(2)
res60: Boolean = true
scala> isEven(3)
res61: Boolean = false
But now we come in problems with path-dependent-types - we have to write their paths explicitly if we want not import them.
There is improve of new Scala version
scala> import scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox
import scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox
scala> import scala.reflect.runtime.{currentMirror => m}
import scala.reflect.runtime.{currentMirror=>m}
scala> val tb = m.mkToolBox()
tb: scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox[reflect.runtime.universe.type] = scala.tools.reflect.ToolBoxFactory$ToolBoxImpl@78dc5f15
scala> val tree = tb.parseExpr("1 to 3 map (_+1)")
<console>:10: error: value parseExpr is not a member of scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox[reflect.runtime.universe.type]
val tree = tb.parseExpr("1 to 3 map (_+1)")
^
scala> val tree = tb.parse("1 to 3 map (_+1)")
tree: tb.u.Tree = 1.to(3).map(((x$1) => x$1.$plus(1)))
scala> val eval = tb.eval(tree)
eval: Any = Vector(2, 3, 4)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With