I'm looking for a description of the root of this error: "Transaction context in use by another session".
I get it sometimes in one of my unittests so I can't provider repro code. But I wonder what is "by design" reason for the error.
UPDATE: the error returns as SqlException from SQL Server 2008. A place where I get the error seems to be single-threaded. But probably I have unittests interaction as I get the error where run several tests at once (MSTest in VS2008sp1). But the failing test looks like:
.
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Transaction context in use by another session.
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TdsExecuteTransactionManagerRequest(Byte[] buffer, TransactionManagerRequestType request, String transactionName, TransactionManagerIsolationLevel isoLevel, Int32 timeout, SqlInternalTransaction transaction, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean isDelegateControlRequest)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.PropagateTransactionCookie(Byte[] cookie)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.EnlistNonNull(Transaction tx)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.Enlist(Transaction tx)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.Activate(Transaction transaction)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionInternal.ActivateConnection(Transaction transaction)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
I've found these posts:
But I can't understand what "Multiple threads sharing the same transaction in a transaction scope will cause the following exception: 'Transaction context in use by another session.'" means. All words are understandable but not the point.
I actually can share a system transaction between threads. And there is even special mechanism for this - DependentTransaction class and Transaction.DependentClone method.
I'm trying to reproduce a usecase from the first post:
with such code:
using System;
using System.Threading;
using System.Transactions;
using System.Data;
using System.Data.SqlClient;
public class Program
{
private static string ConnectionString = "Initial Catalog=DB;Data Source=.;User ID=user;PWD=pwd;";
public static void Main()
{
int MAX = 100;
for(int i =0; i< MAX;i++)
{
using(var ctx = new TransactionScope())
{
var tx = Transaction.Current;
// make the transaction distributed
using (SqlConnection con1 = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
using (SqlConnection con2 = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
{
con1.Open();
con2.Open();
}
showSysTranStatus();
DependentTransaction dtx = Transaction.Current.DependentClone(DependentCloneOption.BlockCommitUntilComplete);
Thread t1 = new Thread(o => workCallback(dtx));
Thread t2 = new Thread(o => workCallback(dtx));
t1.Start();
t2.Start();
t1.Join();
t2.Join();
ctx.Complete();
}
trace("root transaction completes");
}
}
private static void workCallback(DependentTransaction dtx)
{
using(var txScope1 = new TransactionScope(dtx))
{
using (SqlConnection con2 = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
{
con2.Open();
trace("connection opened");
showDbTranStatus(con2);
}
txScope1.Complete();
}
trace("dependant tran completes");
}
private static void trace(string msg)
{
Console.WriteLine(Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId + " : " + msg);
}
private static void showSysTranStatus()
{
string msg;
if (Transaction.Current != null)
msg = Transaction.Current.TransactionInformation.DistributedIdentifier.ToString();
else
msg = "no sys tran";
trace( msg );
}
private static void showDbTranStatus(SqlConnection con)
{
var cmd = con.CreateCommand();
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT 1";
var c = cmd.ExecuteScalar();
trace("@@TRANCOUNT = " + c);
}
}
It fails on Complete's call of root TransactionScope. But error is different: Unhandled Exception: System.Transactions.TransactionInDoubtException: The transaction is in doubt. ---> pired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.
To sum up: I want to understand what "Transaction context in use by another session" means and how to reproduce it.
The transaction context is a pseudo-object that is passed to the server object from the client, or from one server object to another, in the case where one server object is invoking methods on another, and hence acting as its client. The transaction context carries the state of the transaction.
Basically Loopback linked servers are mainly useful when testing an application that uses distributed queries on a single server network. Note that they cannot be used in a distributed transactions.
It's a bit late for answer :) but hope it will be useful for others. Answer contains three parts:
1. What does it mean "Transaction context in use by another session."
Important notice: Transaction context lock is acquired just before and released immediately after interaction between SqlConnection
and SQL Server.
When you execute some SQL Query, SqlConnection
"looks" is there any transaction wrapping it. It may be SqlTransaction
("native" for SqlConnection) or Transaction
from System.Transactions
assembly.
When transaction found SqlConnection
uses it to communicate with SQL Server and at the moment they communicate Transaction
context is exclusively locked.
What does TransactionScope
? It creates Transaction
and provides .NET Framework Components infromation about it, so everyone including SqlConnection can (and by design should) use it.
So declaring TransactionScope
we're creating new Transaction which is available to all "transactable" objects instantiated in current Thread
.
Described error means the following:
SqlConnections
under the same TransactionContext
(which means they related to the same transaction)SqlConnection
to communicate with SQL Server simultaneouslyTransaction
context and next one throwed error2. How to reproduce error "Transaction context in use by another session."
First of all, transaction context is used ("locked") right at the time of sql command execution. So it's difficult to reproduce such a behavior for sure.
But we can try to do it by starting multiple threads running relatively long SQL operations under the single transaction.
Let's prepare table [dbo].[Persons]
in [tests]
Database:
USE [tests]
GO
DROP TABLE [dbo].[Persons]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Persons](
[Id] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
[Name] [nvarchar](1024) NOT NULL,
[Nick] [nvarchar](1024) NOT NULL,
[Email] [nvarchar](1024) NOT NULL)
GO
DECLARE @Counter INT
SET @Counter = 500
WHILE (@Counter > 0) BEGIN
INSERT [dbo].[Persons] ([Name], [Nick], [Email])
VALUES ('Sheev Palpatine', 'DarthSidious', '[email protected]')
SET @Counter = @Counter - 1
END
GO
And reproduce "Transaction context in use by another session." error with C# code based on Shrike code example
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading;
using System.Transactions;
using System.Data.SqlClient;
namespace SO.SQL.Transactions
{
public static class TxContextInUseRepro
{
const int Iterations = 100;
const int ThreadCount = 10;
const int MaxThreadSleep = 50;
const string ConnectionString = "Initial Catalog=tests;Data Source=.;" +
"User ID=testUser;PWD=Qwerty12;";
static readonly Random Rnd = new Random();
public static void Main()
{
var txOptions = new TransactionOptions();
txOptions.IsolationLevel = IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted;
using (var ctx = new TransactionScope(
TransactionScopeOption.Required, txOptions))
{
var current = Transaction.Current;
DependentTransaction dtx = current.DependentClone(
DependentCloneOption.BlockCommitUntilComplete);
for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
{
// make the transaction distributed
using (SqlConnection con1 = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
using (SqlConnection con2 = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
{
con1.Open();
con2.Open();
}
var threads = new List<Thread>();
for (int j = 0; j < ThreadCount; j++)
{
Thread t1 = new Thread(o => WorkCallback(dtx));
threads.Add(t1);
t1.Start();
}
for (int j = 0; j < ThreadCount; j++)
threads[j].Join();
}
dtx.Complete();
ctx.Complete();
}
}
private static void WorkCallback(DependentTransaction dtx)
{
using (var txScope1 = new TransactionScope(dtx))
{
using (SqlConnection con2 = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString))
{
Thread.Sleep(Rnd.Next(MaxThreadSleep));
con2.Open();
using (var cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Persons]", con2))
using (cmd.ExecuteReader()) { } // simply recieve data
}
txScope1.Complete();
}
}
}
}
And in conclusion a few words about implementing transaction support in your application:
SELECT
/UPDATE
/ etc... requests in a single queue and serve them with a single-thread worker;TransactionScope
. Default is Serializable
but in most cases ReadCommitted
is enough;TransactionScope
and DependentTransaction
"Multiple threads sharing the same transaction in a transaction scope will cause the following exception: 'Transaction context in use by another session.'"
Sounds pretty straightforward. If you enlist two different connections in the same transaction, then try to issue commands on each of the two connections, simultaneously, from different threads, a conflict could occur.
In other words, one thread is issuing a command on one connection and holds some kind of lock on the transaction context. The other thread, using the other connection, tries to execute commands at the same time, and cannot lock the same transaction context, which is being used by the other thread.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With