What is the pandas equivalent of dplyr summarize/aggregate by multiple functions?

Question

I'm having issues transitioning to pandas from R where dplyr package can easily group-by and perform multiple summarizations.

Please help improve my existing Python pandas code for multiple aggregations:

import pandas as pd data = pd.DataFrame(     {'col1':[1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2],     'col2':[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0],      'col3':[-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,0]     } ) result = [] for k,v in data.groupby('col1'):     result.append([k, max(v['col2']), min(v['col3'])]) print pd.DataFrame(result, columns=['col1', 'col2_agg', 'col3_agg']) 

Issues:

• too verbose
• probably can be optimized and efficient. (I rewrote a for-loop groupby implementation into groupby.agg and the performance enhancement was huge).

In R the equivalent code would be:

data %>% groupby(col1) %>% summarize(col2_agg=max(col2), col3_agg=min(col3)) 

---

UPDATE: @ayhan solved my question, here is a follow-up question that I will post here instead of as comment:

Q2) What is the equivalent of groupby().summarize(newcolumn=max(col2 * col3)) i.e. an aggregation/summarization where the function is a compound function of 2+ columns?

Answer 1

The equivalent of

df %>% groupby(col1) %>% summarize(col2_agg=max(col2), col3_agg=min(col3)) 

is

df.groupby('col1').agg({'col2': 'max', 'col3': 'min'}) 

which returns

      col2  col3 col1             1        5    -5 2        9    -9 

The returning object is a pandas.DataFrame with an index called col1 and columns named col2 and col3. By default, when you group your data pandas sets the grouping column(s) as index for efficient access and modification. However, if you don't want that, there are two alternatives to set col1 as a column.

• Pass as_index=False:

  df.groupby('col1', as_index=False).agg({'col2': 'max', 'col3': 'min'}) 

• Call reset_index:

  df.groupby('col1').agg({'col2': 'max', 'col3': 'min'}).reset_index() 

both yield

col1  col2  col3               1     5    -5    2     9    -9 

You can also pass multiple functions to groupby.agg.

agg_df = df.groupby('col1').agg({'col2': ['max', 'min', 'std'],                                   'col3': ['size', 'std', 'mean', 'max']}) 

This also returns a DataFrame but now it has a MultiIndex for columns.

     col2               col3                          max min       std size       std mean max col1                                            1       5   1  1.581139    5  1.581139   -3  -1 2       9   0  3.535534    5  3.535534   -6   0 

MultiIndex is very handy for selection and grouping. Here are some examples:

agg_df['col2']  # select the second column       max  min       std col1                     1       5    1  1.581139 2       9    0  3.535534  agg_df[('col2', 'max')]  # select the maximum of the second column Out:  col1 1    5 2    9 Name: (col2, max), dtype: int64  agg_df.xs('max', axis=1, level=1)  # select the maximum of all columns Out:        col2  col3 col1             1        5    -1 2        9     0 

Earlier (before version 0.20.0) it was possible to use dictionaries for renaming the columns in the agg call. For example

df.groupby('col1')['col2'].agg({'max_col2': 'max'}) 

would return the maximum of the second column as max_col2:

      max_col2 col1           1            5 2            9 

However, it was deprecated in favor of the rename method:

df.groupby('col1')['col2'].agg(['max']).rename(columns={'max': 'col2_max'})        col2_max col1           1            5 2            9 

It can get verbose for a DataFrame like agg_df defined above. You can use a renaming function to flatten those levels in that case:

agg_df.columns = ['_'.join(col) for col in agg_df.columns]        col2_max  col2_min  col2_std  col3_size  col3_std  col3_mean  col3_max col1                                                                         1            5         1  1.581139          5  1.581139         -3        -1 2            9         0  3.535534          5  3.535534         -6         0 

For operations like groupby().summarize(newcolumn=max(col2 * col3)), you can still use agg by first adding a new column with assign.

df.assign(new_col=df.eval('col2 * col3')).groupby('col1').agg('max')         col2  col3  new_col col1                      1        5    -1       -1 2        9     0        0 

This returns maximum for old and new columns but as always you can slice that.

df.assign(new_col=df.eval('col2 * col3')).groupby('col1')['new_col'].agg('max')  col1 1   -1 2    0 Name: new_col, dtype: int64 

With groupby.apply this would be shorter:

df.groupby('col1').apply(lambda x: (x.col2 * x.col3).max())  col1 1   -1 2    0 dtype: int64 

However, groupby.apply treats this as a custom function so it is not vectorized. Up to now, the functions we passed to agg ('min', 'max', 'min', 'size' etc.) are vectorized and these are aliases for those optimized functions. You can replace df.groupby('col1').agg('min') with df.groupby('col1').agg(min), df.groupby('col1').agg(np.min) or df.groupby('col1').min() and they will all execute the same function. You will not see the same efficiency when you use custom functions.

Lastly, as of version 0.20, agg can be used on DataFrames directly, without having to group first. See examples here.

Answer 2

Check the side-by-side comparison given by Pandas documentation here: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/comparison_with_r.html#grouping-and-summarizing

R's dplyr

gdf <- group_by(df, col1) summarise(gdf, avg=mean(col1, na.rm=TRUE))   

Pandas

gdf = df.groupby('col1') df.groupby('col1').agg({'col1': 'mean'})