Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

What is the easiest way to convert from asp classic to asp.net?

I am a .Net developer that has been tasked with upgrading a classic asp website to asp.net. The website is currently running on luck and bubble gum but there is not enough time or money to stop progress and do a full rewrite. Of course I will still need to be able to deliver new features while I am upgrading.

What strategies should I use to make a smooth gradual change to asp.net? Should I convert to a single tier .net solution and then refactor to a proper multi-tier solution or should I design my business and data layers now? Should I go straight to 3.5 or is it easier to just get to 1.1 and upgrade to 2.0 or 3.5 after?

A full conversion would probably take 3-5 months. There is also some existing 1.1 code, which is why I am considering using that as a jumping off point.

like image 233
OrionRobillard Avatar asked Sep 18 '08 18:09

OrionRobillard


People also ask

Is ASP classic still used?

It used scripting on the server to create content that would then be sent to a client's web browser, and it enjoyed a tremendous amount of success in its time as a result. Classic ASP, however, is no longer being developed by Microsoft at all - it has long since been replaced by ASP.NET in 2002, a newer alternative.

Does Classic ASP use .NET framework?

Classic ASP was designed a long time ago before even . NET Framework was released, so unless your page needs to interoperate with . NET, there is no need to install or enable .

Is ASP.NET going away?

Does this mean ASP.NET Web Forms is dead and should no longer be used? Of course not! As long as the . NET Framework ships as part of Windows, ASP.NET Web Forms will be a supported framework.


1 Answers

Don't throw away your code!

It's the single worst mistake you can make (on a large codebase). See Things You Should Never Do, Part 1.

You've invested a lot of effort into that old code and worked out many bugs. Throwing it away is a classic developer mistake (and one I've done many times). It makes you feel "better", like a spring cleaning. But you don't need to buy a new apartment and all new furniture to outfit your house. You can work on one room at a time... and maybe some things just need a new paintjob. Hence, this is where refactoring comes in.

For new functionality in your app, write it in C# and call it from your classic ASP. You'll be forced to be modular when you rewrite this new code. When you have time, refactor parts of your old code into C# as well, and work out the bugs as you go. Eventually, you'll have replaced your app with all new code.

You could also write your own compiler. We wrote one for our classic ASP app a long time ago to allow us to output PHP. It's called Wasabi and I think it's the reason Jeff Atwood thought Joel Spolsky went off his rocker. Actually, maybe we should just ship it, and then you could use that.

It allowed us to switch our entire codebase to .NET for the next release while only rewriting a very small portion of our source. It also caused a bunch of people to call us crazy, but writing a compiler is not that complicated, and it gave us a lot of flexibility.

Also, if this is an internal only app, just leave it. Don't rewrite it - you are the only customer and if the requirement is you need to run it as classic asp, you can meet that requirement.

like image 89
Michael Pryor Avatar answered Sep 30 '22 03:09

Michael Pryor