What is the difference between Bootstrap .container and .container-fluid classes?

Question

Just downloaded 3.1 and found in the docs...

Turn any fixed-width grid layout into a full-width layout by changing your outermost .container to .container-fluid.

Looking in bootstrap.css, it appears that .container-fluid is identical to .container. Both have the same CSS, and every instance of .container-fluid is paired with .container, and all column classes are specified in percentages.

When twiddling with examples I could not see any difference, as everything seemed fluid.

As I'm new to Bootstrap, I assume I'm missing something. Could someone take a minute and enlighten me?

Answer 1

Quick version: .container has one fixed width for each screen size in bootstrap (xs,sm,md,lg); .container-fluid expands to fill the available width.

---

The difference between container and container-fluid comes from these lines of CSS:

@media (min-width: 568px) {   .container {     width: 550px;   } } @media (min-width: 992px) {   .container {     width: 970px;   } } @media (min-width: 1200px) {   .container {     width: 1170px;   } } 

Depending on the width of the viewport that the webpage is being viewed on, the container class gives its div a specific fixed width. These lines don't exist in any form for container-fluid, so its width changes every time the viewport width changes.

So for example, say your browser window is 1000px wide. As it's greater than the min-width of 992px, your .container element will have a width of 970px. You then slowly widen your browser window. The width of your .container won't change until you get to 1200px, at which it will jump to 1170px wide and stay that way for any larger browser widths.

Your .container-fluid element, on the other hand, will constantly resize as you make even the smallest changes to your browser width.