The GitHub API documentation shows the following example of an answer of an API call.
"files": [
{
"sha": "bbcd538c8e72b8c175046e27cc8f907076331401",
"filename": "file1.txt",
"status": "added",
"additions": 103,
"deletions": 21,
"changes": 124,
"blob_url": "https://github.com/octocat/Hello-World/blob/6dcb09b5b57875f334f61aebed695e2e4193db5e/file1.txt",
"raw_url": "https://github.com/octocat/Hello-World/raw/6dcb09b5b57875f334f61aebed695e2e4193db5e/file1.txt",
"contents_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/octocat/Hello-World/contents/file1.txt?ref=6dcb09b5b57875f334f61aebed695e2e4193db5e",
"patch": "@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ module Test @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ module Test"
}
]
Now I want to consume the content of the single files of the answer.
Which of the 3 links should I choose from
What are the differences? What is meant for what purpose?
The content_url
one (from repo get content API) supports custom media type
application/vnd.github.VERSION.raw
application/vnd.github.VERSION.html
The raw_url
one is a shortcut to the first of those media types.
The blob_url
one is only see for files in commits, and serves the content of that file as stocked in a git repo, without notion of media type.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With