Simple MWE:
int* ptr = (int*)malloc(64 * sizeof(int));
_mm_prefetch((const char*)(ptr + 64), _MM_HINT_0);
I'm asking since I can see such prefetching in compiler generated code, where inside a loop prefetching is done without checking the address (stored in rbx
):
400e73: 49 83 c5 40 add r13,0x40
400e77: 62 f1 f9 08 28 03 vmovapd zmm0,ZMMWORD PTR [rbx]
400e7d: 4d 3b ec cmp r13,r12
400e80: 62 d1 f9 08 eb 4d ff vporq zmm1,zmm0,ZMMWORD PTR [r13-0x40]
400e87: 90 nop
400e88: 62 d1 78 08 29 4d ff vmovaps ZMMWORD PTR [r13-0x40],zmm1
400e8f: 72 03 jb 400e94 <main+0x244>
400e91: 49 89 c5 mov r13,rax
400e94: 62 f1 78 08 18 53 1d vprefetch1 [rbx+0x740]
400e9b: ff c1 inc ecx
400e9d: 62 f1 78 08 18 4b 02 vprefetch0 [rbx+0x80]
400ea4: 48 83 c3 40 add rbx,0x40
400ea8: 81 f9 00 00 10 00 cmp ecx,0x100000
400eae: 72 c3 jb 400e73 <main+0x223>
Invalid email addresses are addresses that do not receive emails. An address could be formatted incorrectly, there could be a typo, the address could no longer exist, or it could be inactive.
If you send your Bitcoins to an absolutely invalid address, that does not even exist yet, then you don’t have much to worry about. Ideally, the safety check on the transaction initiates a refund and you get your Bitcoins back. To put it in simpler terms, they don’t go away to begin with.
Once you send an email to what you discover is an incorrect email address, there is nothing you can do. Someone may or may not read it. You may or may not find out about it. Depending on what was wrong with the email address and the configuration of the email system, many things could happen to your misdirected email.
When the capacity limit of prefetch files reached it automatically delete all the information and prefetch files. Capacity depends upon the operating system of the machine. Provide encrypted information on the executable application.
First of all, the compiler doing it or you doing it are very different things in theory. Just because it looks equivalent doesn't make it so, the compiler is allowed to use any dirty hacks that work no matter whether they're expressible or defined in fully standard C.
Of course prefetching doesn't generate signals*, it would be nearly useless if it did. It can be very slow for some invalid pointers though, depending on whether they trigger a TLB miss. So the compiler can safely use it, but it shouldn't indiscriminately use it for everything ever.
Now using pointer arithmetic to create out of bounds pointers (except just past the end) is UB in theory, but when applied to a pointer it's the kind of UB that will mostly work anyway (with flat memory it's just an addition, the only way it could fail is if the compiler goes out of its way to detect it, and that means it would have to reason about dynamic sizes). Obviously the above case must be supported by compilers claiming to support SSE intrinsics otherwise you couldn't reasonably use prefetching, as demonstrated by this answer (and there's a bunch more extra guarantees they must make on top of the Standard).
* from the manual:
The PREFETCHh instruction is merely a hint and does not affect program behavior.
Signal would affect program behavior, so they cannot be generated.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With