When I run git diff
, the output begins with:
diff --git a/foo/bar b/foo/bar
If I try to run plain old diff --git
, I'm told that the --git
option doesn't exist (obviously, I guess, it would seem silly for a low-level tool to know about a specific DVCS). There's no mention of it in the man
page as well. Where does this come from?
Diffing is a function that takes two input data sets and outputs the changes between them. git diff is a multi-use Git command that when executed runs a diff function on Git data sources. These data sources can be commits, branches, files and more.
The git diff command shows the differences between the files in two commits or between your current repository and a previous commit. This command displays changes denotes by headers and metadata for the files that have changed.
git diff --staged will only show changes to files in the "staged" area. git diff HEAD will show all changes to tracked files. If you have all changes staged for commit, then both commands will output the same.
It's an "imaginary diff option", used to indicate to the reader that it's not just the output of running the diff
command. For example, in git's own git repo:
$ git diff HEAD~1..HEAD | head diff --git Documentation/git.txt Documentation/git.txt index bd659c4..7913fc2 100644 --- Documentation/git.txt +++ Documentation/git.txt @@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ unreleased) version of Git, that is available from the 'master' branch of the `git.git` repository. Documentation for older releases are available here: +* link:v2.10.0/git.html[documentation for release 2.10] + $
The diff
command itself, if you invoked it with the same file name twice, would show no differences. git
presumably creates temporary files corresponding to two different versions of Documentation/git.txt
and feeds them to diff
-- but the names of those temporary files would not be useful. I think git diff
massages the output of diff
to make it more meaningful to the reader. (This speculation was not entirely correct. See below.)
Diving into the git source code, diff.c
has the string "diff --git"
hardwired as a string literal:
strbuf_addf(&header, "%s%sdiff --git %s %s%s\n", line_prefix, meta, a_one, b_two, reset);
And looking into the history of diff.c
for the earliest version that contains that string:
$ git log -n 1 b58f23b3 commit b58f23b38a9a9f28d751311353819d3cdf6a86da Author: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> Date: 2005-05-18 09:10:47 -0700 [PATCH] Fix diff output take #4. This implements the output format suggested by Linus in <[email protected]>, except the imaginary diff option is spelled "diff --git" with double dashes as suggested by Matthias Urlichs. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> $
Presumably <Pine.LNX...>
is the message-id of some email message in a mailing list somewhere. In any case, this commit message makes it clear that diff --git
is an "imaginary diff option".
This email message, cited by nos in a comment, appears to be part of the discussion that led to this.
UPDATE: I speculated above that git diff
massages the output of diff
, adding this information. I just tried running git diff
under strace
. It doesn't actually invoke the diff
command, or any other command. Rather, all the output is printed by the git
process itself, and apparently it computes the differences internally. This behavior might also depend on the version of git
(I'm using 2.23.0), the diff
command(s) available, and the arguments used.
I'll note that GNU diff has a --label=LABEL
option that could be used for this kind of thing:
'-L LABEL' '--label=LABEL' Use LABEL instead of the file name in the context format (*note Context Format::) and unified format (*note Unified Format::) headers. *Note RCS::.
but git diff
doesn't use it, at least in the one case I tried, and I don't see a reference to it in the git sources.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With