I've recently learned how to vectorize a "simple" nested loop in a previous question I've asked. However, now I'm trying also to vectorize the following loop
A=rand(80,80,10,6,8,8);
I=rand(size(A1,3),1);
C=rand(size(A1,4),1);
B=rand(size(A1,5),1);
for i=1:numel(I)
for v=1:numel(C)
for j=1:numel(B)
for k=1:j
A(:,:,i,v,j,k)= A(:,:,i,v,j,k)*I(i)*C(v)*B(j)*((k-1>0)+1);
end
end
end
end
So now k
depends in j
... What have I tried so far:
The combination of j
and k
terms (i.e. B(j)*((k-1>0)+1)
gives a triangular matrix that I manage to vectorize independently:
B2=tril([ones(8,1)*B']');
B2(2:end,2:end)=2*B2(2:end,2:end);
But that gives me the (j,k) matrix properly and not a way to use it to vectorize the remaining loop. Maybe I'm in the wrong path too... So how can I vectorize that type of loop?
In one of your comments to the accepted solution of the previous question, you mentioned that successive bsxfun(@times,..,permute..)
based codes were faster. If that's the case, you can use a similar approach here as well. Here's the code that uses such a pattern alongwith tril
-
B1 = tril(bsxfun(@times,B,[1 ones(1,numel(B)-1).*2]));
v1 = bsxfun(@times,B1, permute(C,[3 2 1]));
v2 = bsxfun(@times,v1, permute(I,[4 3 2 1]));
A = bsxfun(@times,A, permute(v2,[5 6 4 3 1 2]));
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With