Rcpp allows to vectorize some operations, which is great. But for pow
only the base number can be a vector, not the exponent. Typically, on compilation:
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
NumericVector puissancedCpp(NumericVector base, double exp){
return pow(base,exp);
}
works but not:
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
NumericVector puissancedCpp(NumericVector base, NumericVector exp){
return pow(base,exp);
}
What would be the recommended way to perform what in R would be:
c(0,1,2,3)^c(4,3,2,1)
in the middle of other things done in C?
An alternative if you for some reason can't use C++11
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
NumericVector vecpow(const NumericVector base, const NumericVector exp) {
NumericVector out(base.size());
std::transform(base.begin(), base.end(),
exp.begin(), out.begin(), ::pow);
return out;
}
/*** R
vecpow(c(0:3), c(4:1))
***/
which produces
R> Rcpp::sourceCpp("vecpow.cpp")
R> vecpow(c(0:3), c(4:1))
[1] 0 1 4 3
R>
Here's one option, assuming your compiler supports C++11:
#include <Rcpp.h>
// [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp11)]]
// [[Rcpp::export]]
std::vector<double> vpow(const std::vector<double>& base, const std::vector<double>& exp) {
std::vector<double> res(base.size());
std::transform(base.begin(), base.end(), exp.begin(), res.begin(),
[&](double lhs, double rhs) -> double {
return std::pow(lhs, rhs);
});
return res;
}
/*** R
c(0,1,2,3)^c(4,3,2,1)
#[1] 0 1 4 3
vpow(0:3, c(4,3,2,1))
#[1] 0 1 4 3
*/
If you're working with an older compiler, you could achieve this using
double dpow(const double lhs, const double rhs) {
return std::pow(lhs, rhs);
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
std::vector<double> vpow98(const std::vector<double>& base, const std::vector<double>& exp) {
std::vector<double> res(base.size());
std::transform(base.begin(), base.end(), exp.begin(), res.begin(), dpow);
return res;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With