I know that using the %s format specifier and std::string like this leads to undefined behaviour:
std::string myString = "test";
printf("%s", myString);
But is it save to use the same specifier and a std::string with boost::format?
#include <boost/format.hpp>
int main() 
{
   std::string myString = "test";
   boost::format fmt("%s");
   fmt % myString;
   std::cout << fmt.str();
   return 0;
}
%s specifies a (const) char*, but I provide a std::string. Could this lead to UB too?
The format library provides a class for formatting arguments according to a format-string, as does printf, but with two major differences : format sends the arguments to an internal stream, and so is entirely type-safe and naturally supports all user-defined types.
%p expects the argument to be of type (void *) and prints out the address. Whereas %x converts an unsigned int to unsigned hexadecimal and prints out the result.
It is safe to use %s with boost::format and std::string. In contrast to printf, the type character in the format string "does not impose the concerned arguments to be of a restricted set of types, but merely sets the flags that are associated with this type specification."
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/format/doc/format.html#printf_directives
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With