Although vectors are best suited for procedural programming, I would like to use a map
function on them. The following snippet works:
fn map<A, B>(u: &Vec<A>, f: &Fn(&A) -> B) -> Vec<B> { let mut res: Vec<B> = Vec::with_capacity(u.len()); for x in u.iter() { res.push(f(x)); } res } fn f(x: &i32) -> i32 { *x + 1 } fn main() { let u = vec![1, 2, 3]; let v = map(&u, &f); println!("{} {} {}", v[0], v[1], v[2]); }
Why isn't there any such function in the standard library? (and also in std::collections::LinkedList
). Is there another way to deal with it?
Vector elements are placed in contiguous storage so that they can be accessed and traversed using iterators. Map of Vectors in STL: Map of Vectors can be very efficient in designing complex data structures.
map uses vector as the key Map in c++ is implemented by a Red Black tree, which is an essential balanced binary search tree. It is not a hash table, so it doesn't need that the key is hashable. However, it requires that the key support <, >, or == operations.
Rust likes to be more general than that; mapping is done over iterators, rather than over solely vectors or slices.
A couple of demonstrations:
let u = vec![1, 2, 3]; let v: Vec<_> = u.iter().map(f).collect();
let u = vec![1, 2, 3]; let v = u.iter().map(|&x| x + 1).collect::<Vec<_>>();
.collect()
is probably the most magic part of it, and allows you to collect all the elements of the iterator into a large variety of different types, as shown by the implementors of FromIterator
. For example, an iterator of T
s can be collected to Vec<T>
, of char
s can be collected to a String
, of (K, V)
pairs to a HashMap<K, V>
, and so forth.
This way of working with iterators also means that you often won’t even need to create intermediate vectors where in other languages or with other techniques you would; this is more efficient and typically just as natural.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With