I'm trying to use the WHEN
clause with a >
or <
comparison.
This doesn't compile. Is there a way of using the normal set of boolean operators (< <=, >= >) in a comparison to enable this?
val foo = 2 // doesn't compile when (foo) { > 0 -> doSomethingWhenPositive() 0 -> doSomethingWhenZero() < 0 -> doSomethingWhenNegative() }
I tried to find an unbounded range comparison, but couldn't make this work either? Is it possible to write this as an unbounded range?
// trying to get an unbounded range - doesn't compile when (foo) { in 1.. -> doSomethingWhenPositive() else -> doSomethingElse() }
You can put the whole expression in the second part, which is OK but seems like unnecessary duplication. At least it compiles and works.
when { foo > 0 -> doSomethingWhenPositive() foo < 0 -> doSomethingWhenNegative() else -> doSomethingWhenZero() }
But I'm not sure that is any simpler than the if-else alternative we have been doing for years. Something like:
if ( foo > 0 ) { doSomethingWhenPositive() } else if (foo < 0) { doSomethingWhenNegative() } else { doSomethingWhenZero() }
Of course, real world problems are more complex than the above, and the WHEN
clause is attractive but doesn't work as I expect for this type of comparison.
The -> is a separator. It is special symbol used to separate code with different purposes. It can be used to: Separate the parameters and body of a lambda expression val sum = { x: Int, y: Int -> x + y }
when can be used either as an expression or as a statement. If it is used as an expression, the value of the first matching branch becomes the value of the overall expression. If it is used as a statement, the values of individual branches are ignored.
Even a flexible language such as Kotlin doesn't have a "elegant" / DRY solution for each and every case.
You can write something like:
when (foo) { in 0 .. Int.MAX_VALUE -> doSomethingWhenPositive() 0 -> doSomethingWhenZero() else -> doSomethingWhenNegative() }
But then you depend on the variable type.
I believe the following form is the most idiomatic in Kotlin:
when { foo > 0 -> doSomethingWhenPositive() foo == 0 -> doSomethingWhenZero() else -> doSomethingWhenNegative() }
Yeah... there is some (minimal) code duplication.
Some languages (Ruby?!) tried to provide an uber-elegant form for any case - but there is a tradeoff: the language becomes more complex and more difficult for a programmer to know end-to-end.
My 2 cents...
The grammar for a when
condition is as follows:
whenCondition (used by whenEntry) : expression : ("in" | "!in") expression : ("is" | "!is") type ;
This means that you can only use is
or in
as special cases that do not have to be a full expression; everything else must be a normal expression. Since > 0
is not a valid expression this will not compile.
Furthermore, ranges are closed in Kotlin, so you cannot get away with trying to use an unbounded range.
Instead you should use the when
statement with a full expression, as in your example:
when { foo > 0 -> doSomethingWhenPositive() foo < 0 -> doSomethingWhenNegative() else -> doSomethingWhenZero() }
Or alternatively:
when { foo < 0 -> doSomethingWhenNegative() foo == 0 -> doSomethingWhenZero() foo > 0 -> doSomethingWhenPositive() }
which may be more readable.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With