I know that multiple parameters can be passed to COALESCE
, but when you want to to check just one expression to see if it doesn't exist, do you use a default or is it a better practice to use ISNULL
instead?
Is there any performance gain between the two?
advantage that COALESCE has over ISNULL is that it supports more than two inputs, whereas ISNULL supports only two. Another advantage of COALESCE is that it's a standard function (namely, defined by the ISO/ANSI SQL standards), whereas ISNULL is T-SQL–specific.
Comparing COALESCE and ISNULL Data type determination of the resulting expression is different. ISNULL uses the data type of the first parameter, COALESCE follows the CASE expression rules and returns the data type of value with the highest precedence.
The ISNULL and Coalesce functions are both used to replace null values with a user-defined value.
mysql - SQL: Alternative to COALESCE() function that groups all values into one column - Stack Overflow.
This problem reported on Microsoft Connect reveals some differences between COALESCE
and ISNULL
:
an early part of our processing rewrites
COALESCE( expression1, expression2 )
asCASE WHEN expression1 IS NOT NULL THEN expression1 ELSE expression2 END
. In [this example]:COALESCE ( ( SELECT Nullable FROM Demo WHERE SomeCol = 1 ), 1 )
we generate:
SELECT CASE WHEN (SELECT Nullable FROM Demo WHERE SomeCol = 1) IS NOT NULL THEN (SELECT Nullable FROM Demo WHERE SomeCol = 1) ELSE 1 END
Later stages of query processing don't understand that the two subqueries were originally the same expression, so they execute the subquery twice...
One workaround, though I hate to suggest it, is to change
COALESCE
toISNULL
, since the latter doesn't duplicate the subquery.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With