Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Using <include> with <merge> in ConstraintLayout

I am having trouble using tags <include> and <merge> inside a ConstraintLayout.

I want to create a flat view hierarchy (hence Constraints) but still have elements that are reusable. So I use <include> in my layout and <merge> in the included layouts to avoid having nested layouts (especially avoiding nested ConstraintLayouts)

So I wrote this: Parent layout

<android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout
    android:layout_width="match_parent"
    android:layout_height="match_parent">

    <include
        android:id="@+id/review_1"
        layout="@layout/view_movie_note"
        android:layout_width="0dp"
        android:layout_height="0dp"
        app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintLeft_toLeftOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintRight_toLeftOf="@+id/review_2"/>

    <include
        layout="@layout/view_movie_note"
        android:id="@+id/review_2"
        android:layout_width="0dp"
        android:layout_height="0dp"
        android:layout_marginLeft="7dp"
        app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintLeft_toRightOf="@+id/review_1"
        app:layout_constraintRight_toRightOf="parent"
        />

</android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout>

and this view_movie_note :

<merge>

    <TextView
        android:id="@+id/note_origin"
        android:layout_width="wrap_content"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:layout_marginBottom="15dp"
        android:layout_marginStart="5dp"
        app:layout_constraintStart_toStartOf="@+id/cardView2"
        app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent"
        android:layout_marginLeft="5dp" />


    <android.support.v7.widget.CardView
        android:id="@+id/five_star_view_container"
        android:layout_width="0dp"
        android:layout_height="52dp"
        android:layout_marginBottom="8dp"
        android:layout_marginTop="10dp"
        android:elevation="3dp"
        app:cardUseCompatPadding="true"
        app:contentPaddingTop="22dp"
        app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintHeight_min="52dp"
        app:layout_constraintStart_toStartOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/note_origin">

        <FiveStarsView
            android:id="@+id/five_star_view"
            android:layout_width="wrap_content"
            android:layout_height="wrap_content"
            android:layout_gravity="center_horizontal" />

    </android.support.v7.widget.CardView>

    <android.support.v7.widget.CardView
        android:id="@+id/cardView2"
        android:layout_width="wrap_content"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:layout_marginTop="20dp"
        app:cardBackgroundColor="@color/colorPrimary"
        app:contentPaddingLeft="15dp"
        app:contentPaddingRight="15dp"
        app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintStart_toStartOf="parent"
        app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="@+id/note_origin">

        <TextView
            android:id="@+id/grade"
            android:layout_width="wrap_content"
            android:layout_height="wrap_content"
            android:textSize="12sp" />

    </android.support.v7.widget.CardView>


</merge>

I am expecting this

I am expecting this

Instead I got this

Instead I get this

Clearly the constraints that I put in the <include> tag are overriden by the constraints in the included layout.

Is this the expected behaviour ? If yes, how are we supposed to keep a flat layout using <include> and ConstraintLayout ?

like image 445
JDenais Avatar asked Sep 27 '17 12:09

JDenais


People also ask

Which is better RelativeLayout or ConstraintLayout?

If you have the choice start with ConstraintLayout, but if you already have your app in RelativeLayout, stay with it. That's all I have been following. RelativeLayout is very limited in functionality and many complex layouts can't be made using it, especially when ratios are involved.

Can we use ConstraintLayout inside ConstraintLayout?

You can use a ConstraintLayout in an other ConstraintLayout but you need to respect some rules. All direct childs of a ConstraintLayout should have constraint on left,top, right and bottom.

Can we use CardView in ConstraintLayout?

Now, for CardView itself -- there are no need for a Nested ConstraintLayout -- CardView is simply a FrameLayout, so if you want to use a ConstraintLayout inside it, everything works. In parallel, you can put a CardView inside a ConstraintLayout, that works too.

What is the difference between ConstraintLayout and Linearlayout?

ConstraintLayout has dual power of both Relative Layout as well as Linear layout: Set relative positions of views ( like Relative layout ) and also set weights for dynamic UI (which was only possible in Linear Layout). Despite the fact that it's awesome, it fails to serve the purpose with simple UI layouts.


3 Answers

Short answer

The best move will be replacing <merge> block with a (nested) ConstraintLayout rather than using redundant layout structure.




ConstraintLayout is great but it doesn't work well with composition and separation of responsibilities of each piece

That is wrong. ConstraintLayout does work well with reusing layouts. Any layout in which all child views are laid out according to relationships between sibling views and the parent layout, behaves exactly like this. This is true even for RelativeLayout.


Then, where is the problem?

Let's take a closer look at what <merge> is.

The doc says

The <merge/> tag helps eliminate redundant view groups in your view hierarchy when including one layout within another.

It will have the same effect as replacing the <include> element with the contents of <merge> block. In other words, the views in the <merge/> block is directly placed to the parent layout without an intermediate view group. Therefore, the constraints of the <include> element is completely ignored.

In this particular example, the views in the including layout is added two times to the parent as the second one on top of another.


Conclusion

Layout resource files are intended to be used independently. To qualify the term reusable, it should not depend on it's parent (The view group in which it will be added in future). It would be looking okay if you had to include the layout only one time. But </merge> won't be a good idea in that case too because you can't place it in any different layout in a different position.

Obviously, flat layout hierarchies have better performance. However, sometimes we may have to sacrifice it.

like image 111
Bertram Gilfoyle Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 03:10

Bertram Gilfoyle


Android documentation says

The <merge /> tag helps eliminate redundant view groups in your view hierarchy when including one layout within another

and has an example too

If your main layout is a vertical LinearLayout in which two consecutive views can be re-used in multiple layouts, then the re-usable layout in which you place the two views requires its own root view. However, using another LinearLayout as the root for the re-usable layout would result in a vertical LinearLayout inside a vertical LinearLayout. The nested LinearLayout serves no real purpose other than to slow down your UI performance.

Also see this answer, which will make you understand merge tag more.

Problem in your layout

For the child layout

You put constraints on child elements inside <merge tag. That's not okay. Because that constraints are destroyed at run time when both child layout are merged inside your parent layout. (You tell me if you can do this without include tag, will your constraints work?)

For parent layout

Same for <include tag, you are giving constraints/custom attributes to <include tag, that will be lost, because <merge tag is joined to the root view, so you can not apply custom attributes to the <include with <merge tag. That's why Bahman answer will work.

Attributes on <include tag works when you have root element inside child layout and no <merge tag.

Conclusion

As this is clear, you are not using <merge and <include, as it should be. You have understand what <include and <merge tag do. So use them appropriately.

If you ask solution

ConstraintLayout was introduced to solve complex layout. Not to increase complexity. So when you can do this easily with LinearLayout why to choose Constraints.

Parent Layout

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout
    xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
    android:layout_width="match_parent"
    android:layout_height="match_parent"
    >

    <include
        android:id="@+id/review_1"
        layout="@layout/view_movie_note"
        android:layout_width="0dp"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:layout_weight="1"
        />

    <include
        android:id="@+id/review_2"
        layout="@layout/view_movie_note"
        android:layout_width="0dp"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:layout_marginLeft="7dp"
        android:layout_weight="1"
        />

</LinearLayout>

view_movie_note.xml

<android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout
    xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
    xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content">

    <TextView
     .../>

    <android.support.v7.widget.CardView
    ...
    </android.support.v7.widget.CardView>

    <android.support.v7.widget.CardView
    ...
    </android.support.v7.widget.CardView>
</android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout>

output

I hope I could make you understand well.

like image 6
Khemraj Sharma Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 02:10

Khemraj Sharma


Wrap include tags with ConstraintLayout tags then move attributes of include tags to these new ConstraintLayout tags:

    <android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout
        android:layout_width="match_parent"
        android:layout_height="match_parent">

    <android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout
            android:id="@+id/review_1"
            android:layout_width="0dp"
            android:layout_height="0dp"
            app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent"
            app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent"
            app:layout_constraintLeft_toLeftOf="parent"
            app:layout_constraintRight_toLeftOf="@+id/review_2">

                    <include  layout="@layout/view_movie_note"  />

   </android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout>

    <android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout
            android:id="@+id/review_2"
            android:layout_width="0dp"
            android:layout_height="0dp"
            android:layout_marginLeft="7dp"
            app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent"
            app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="parent"
            app:layout_constraintLeft_toRightOf="@+id/review_1"
            app:layout_constraintRight_toRightOf="parent">

                       <include layout="@layout/view_movie_note" />

    </android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout>

  </android.support.constraint.ConstraintLayout>
like image 4
ygngy Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 02:10

ygngy