I am trying to understand how to use GetDirectBufferAddress
from the JNI layer. To understand I've build a very simple example:
public class my_image_info {
static {
System.loadLibrary("my_jni");
}
private java.nio.ByteBuffer image_info_bb;
native static void initc( java.nio.ByteBuffer bb );
my_image_info()
{
image_info_bb = java.nio.ByteBuffer.allocateDirect( 5 * 4 );
initc( image_info_bb );
}
public java.nio.ByteBuffer getBB() {
return image_info_bb;
}
static public void main(String argv[]) {
my_image_info fii = new my_image_info();
java.nio.ByteBuffer bb = fii.getBB();
System.out.println("1: " + bb.getInt(0));
System.out.println("2: " + bb.getInt(4));
System.out.println("3: " + bb.getInt(8));
System.out.println("4: " + bb.getInt(12));
System.out.println("5: " + bb.getInt(16));
}
And then from the native JNI layer:
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_my_1image_1info_initc
(JNIEnv *env, jclass cls, jobject jobj)
{
int *iBuf = (*env)->GetDirectBufferAddress(env, jobj);
iBuf[0] = -2;
iBuf[1] = -1;
iBuf[2] = 0;
iBuf[3] = 1;
iBuf[4] = 2;
}
If I run this example over here (debian/linux wheezy amd64) with openjdk :
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_34"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.13.6) (6b34-1.13.6-1~deb7u1)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
Here is what I see:
1: -16777217
2: -1
3: 0
4: 16777216
5: 33554432
I understand the values for index 2 & 3. But all other values do not make any sense to me, I would have expected something like:
1: -2
2: -1
3: 0
4: 1
5: 2
What did I misunderstood from the ByteBuffer
usage in JNI?
Each method that can be called via JNI has a reflection metadata object. The address of this object is used as the method's jmethodID .
env : the JNI interface pointer. name : the name of the class or interface to be defined.
In software design, the Java Native Interface (JNI) is a foreign function interface programming framework that enables Java code running in a Java virtual machine (JVM) to call and be called by native applications (programs specific to a hardware and operating system platform) and libraries written in other languages ...
What I missed from the documentation is that by default java.nio.ByteBuffer
is actually using BIG_ENDIAN
byte order. Which explains the behavior I was seeing on my LITTLE_ENDIAN
system. See ref here.
My code now reads as:
image_info_bb = java.nio.ByteBuffer.allocateDirect( 5 * 4 );
image_info_bb.order( java.nio.ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN );
It appears that by default it is always BIG_ENDIAN
, and no effort has been made so far to provide an API for LITTLE_ENDIAN
, as explained in the bug report here (JDK-5043362 : (bf) NewDirectByteBuffer always has order ByteOrder.BIG_ENDIAN).
Documentation has been updated recently to reflect that:
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With