Background
For fun, I'm trying to write a property for quick-check that can test the basic idea behind cryptography with RSA.
p
and q
.N = p*q
e
is some number relatively prime to (p-1)(q-1)
(in practice, e is usually 3 for fast encoding)d
is the modular inverse of e
modulo (p-1)(q-1)
For all x
such that 1 < x < N
, it is always true that (x^e)^d = x modulo N
In other words, x
is the "message", raising it to the e
th power mod N
is the act of "encoding" the message, and raising the encoded message to the d
th power mod N
is the act of "decoding" it.
(The property is also trivially true for x = 1
, a case which is its own encryption)
Code
Here are the methods I have coded up so far:
import Test.QuickCheck
-- modular exponentiation
modExp :: Integral a => a -> a -> a -> a
modExp y z n = modExp' (y `mod` n) z `mod` n
where modExp' y z | z == 0 = 1
| even z = modExp (y*y) (z `div` 2) n
| odd z = (modExp (y*y) (z `div` 2) n) * y
-- relatively prime
rPrime :: Integral a => a -> a -> Bool
rPrime a b = gcd a b == 1
-- multiplicative inverse (modular)
mInverse :: Integral a => a -> a -> a
mInverse 1 _ = 1
mInverse x y = (n * y + 1) `div` x
where n = x - mInverse (y `mod` x) x
-- just a quick way to test for primality
n `divides` x = x `mod` n == 0
primes = 2:filter isPrime [3..]
isPrime x = null . filter (`divides` x) $ takeWhile (\y -> y*y <= x) primes
-- the property
prop_rsa (p,q,x) = isPrime p &&
isPrime q &&
p /= q &&
x > 1 &&
x < n &&
rPrime e t ==>
x == (x `powModN` e) `powModN` d
where e = 3
n = p*q
t = (p-1)*(q-1)
d = mInverse e t
a `powModN` b = modExp a b n
(Thanks, google and random blog, for the implementation of modular multiplicative inverse)
Question
The problem should be obvious: there are way too many conditions on the property to make it at all usable. Trying to invoke quickCheck prop_rsa
in ghci made my terminal hang.
So I've poked around the QuickCheck manual a bit, and it says:
Properties may take the form
forAll <generator> $ \<pattern> -> <property>
How do I make a <generator>
for prime numbers? Or with the other constraints, so that quickCheck
doesn't have to sift through a bunch of failed conditions?
Any other general advice (especially regarding QuickCheck) is welcome.
Here's one way to make a QuickCheck-compatible prime-number generator (stealing a Sieve of Eratosthenes implementation from http://en.literateprograms.org/Sieve_of_Eratosthenes_(Haskell)):
import Test.QuickCheck
newtype Prime = Prime Int deriving Show
primes = sieve [2..]
where
sieve (p:xs) = Prime p : sieve [x | x <- xs, x `mod` p > 0]
instance Arbitrary Prime where
arbitrary = do i <- arbitrary
return $ primes!!(abs i)
It can be used in QuickCheck like so:
prop_primes_dont_divide (Prime x) (Prime y) = x == y || x `mod` y > 0
For your use, you'd replace p
and q
with (Prime p)
and (Prime q)
in your property.
OK so here's what I did.
Top of file
{-# LANGUAGE NoMonomorphismRestriction #-}
import Test.QuickCheck
import Control.Applicative
All code as given in the question, except for prop_rsa. That was (obviously) heavily modified:
prop_rsa = forAll primePair $ \(p,q) ->
let n = p*q
in forAll (genUnder n) $ \x ->
let e = 3
t = (p-1)*(q-1)
d = mInverse e t
a `powModN` b = modExp a b n
in p /= q &&
rPrime e t ==>
x == (x `powModN` e) `powModN` d
The type for primePair
is Gen (Int, Int)
, and the type for genUnder
is Int -> Gen Int
. I'm not exactly sure what the magic is behind forAll
but I'm pretty sure this is correct. I've done some ad-hoc adjustments to 1) make sure it fails if I mess up the conditions and 2) make sure the nested forAll
is varying the value of x
across test cases.
So here's how to write those generators. Once I realized that <generator>
in the documentation just meant something of type Gen a
, it was cake.
genNonzero = (\x -> if x == 0 then 1 else x) `fmap` arbitrary
genUnder :: Int -> Gen Int
genUnder n = ((`mod` n) . abs) `fmap` genNonzero
genSmallPrime = ((\x -> (primes !! (x `mod` 2500))) . abs) `fmap` arbitrary
primePair :: Gen (Int, Int)
primePair = (,) <$> genSmallPrime <*> genSmallPrime
primePair
took some trial and error for me to get right; I knew that some combinators like that should work, but I'm still not as familiar with fmap
, <$>
and <*>
as I'd like to be. I restricted the computation to only select from among the first 2500 primes; otherwise it apparently wanted to pick some really big ones that took forever to generate.
Random thing to note
Thanks to laziness, d = mInverse e t
isn't computed unless the conditions are met. Which is good, because it's undefined when the condition rPrime e t
is false. In English, an integer a
only has a multiplicative inverse (mod b) when a
and b
are relatively prime.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With