While in Haskell, the following works:
> (+) `liftM` (Just 3) `ap` (Just 5)
Just 8
Frege hints to use parantheses:
frege> (+) `liftM` (Just 3) `ap` (Just 5)
E <console>.fr:12: invalid expression, none-associative operator liftM
found on same level as none-associative operator ap
H <console>.fr:12: Use parentheses to disambiguate an expression like a
liftM b ap c
I found this section in Haskell report:
Expressions involving infix operators are disambiguated by the operator's fixity (see Section 4.4.2). Consecutive unparenthesized operators with the same precedence must both be either left or right associative to avoid a syntax error. Given an unparenthesized expression "x qop(a,i) y qop(b,j) z", parentheses must be added around either "x qop(a,i) y" or "y qop(b,j) z" when i=j unless a=b=l or a=b=r.
In the code above, both the "operators" have no associativity and have the same default precedence so it seems like Frege's behavior is consistent with Haskell report.
Am I understanding this right? Why Frege needs parentheses in this case whereas Haskell is able to disambiguate? or How is Haskell able to disambiguate in this case?
Well, this is because, as it stands, `foo` defaults to non-associativity In Frege, while in Haskell is it left associativity.
This should be corrected in the Frege compiler in order to make it more Haskell compatible.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With