Use cases when lombok or java 'var' is useful [duplicate]

Question

var is not very handful when you're navigating through the code and investigating the code which is not clear at the first look.

When developers use not self-describing methods names you have to spend some time to understand what is real type of the variable. And if you use Lombok's var you will be tightly coupled with Lombok, so I do not use it very often in my code.

What are the useful use cases for using var in Java?

Answer 1

Arguments in favor of var:

• var requires less typing. It's shorter and sometimes easier to read than let's say Map<Integer, ArrayList<String>>.
• var requires less code changes if a return-type of a method call changes. You only have to change the method call, but not every place it's used.
• var encourages a more descriptive name for variables. I.e. var customer = new Customer(); rather than var c = new Customer();.
• When you have multiple variable under one another of different types, the names all line up if they're all var, which wouldn't be the case with the types itself (unless the types coincidentally all have the same length).

Arguments against var:

• var obscures the actual variable type. If the initializer doesn't return a clearly defined type, you may not be able to tell a variable's type.
• Using var is lazy. Although var is certainly easier to type than Map<Integer, ArrayList<String>>, if the variable name isn't named well, you'd have to search a lot deeper in order to know what it refers to.
• var makes it harder to know what the type of the underlying variable actually is.
• You can't use var in all cases. Like:
  • var i = 1, j = 2; - Only one variable is accepted for var at a time.
  • var arr = {1, 2, 3}; - Arrays must be explicitly declared.
  • var f = a -> a + " "; - It cannot determine what type this lambda function is.
  • var f = String::replace; - Method references cannot be used, because they don't have a type of itself. More info here.

Most of these are taken from this post for when to use var in .NET C#, where the var keyword has been present since the beginning, whereas with Java it's only available since version 10.

Oh, and another big advantage of var: it's shorter for code-golfing (creating a program/function which does a certain task/challenge with as few bytes as possible). :) Probably the main reason why I don't mind that it was added, since I codegolf in Java (as well as .NET C#, 05AB1E, and Whitespace) pretty often.

Related: Java 7's diamond operator. List<String> names = new ArrayList<>(); vs List<String> names = new ArrayList<String>();.

Personally I still use written out types instead of var, except for code-golfing. But maybe I just need to get used to it a bit more before using it more often. For readability, and making it clearer and easier to see the type without having to dig, I don't use var at all. As for Java 7's diamond operator, I only use it when I instantiate it directly after the field, but would not when I instantiate it elsewhere (i.e. I would use List<String> names = new ArrayList<>();, but not List<String> names; /* ... some code here ...*/ names = new ArrayList<>();).
In general it all comes down to preference, though.