Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Usage of CoTaskMemAlloc?

When is it appropriate to use CoTaskMemAlloc? Can someone give an example?

like image 698
atVelu Avatar asked Dec 26 '08 05:12

atVelu


2 Answers

Use CoTaskMemAlloc when returning a char* from a native C++ library to .NET as a string.

C#

[DllImport("test.dll", CharSet=CharSet.Ansi)]
extern static string Foo();

C

char* Foo()
{
    std::string response("response");
    int len = response.length() + 1;
    char* buff = (char*) CoTaskMemAlloc(len);
    strcpy_s(buff, len, response.c_str());
    return buff;
}

Since .NET uses CoTaskMemFree, you have to allocate the string like this, you can't allocate it on the stack or the heap using malloc / new.

like image 141
Maurice Flanagan Avatar answered Sep 26 '22 03:09

Maurice Flanagan


Gosh, I had to think for a while for this one -- I've done a fair amount of small-scale COM programming with ATL and rarely have had to use it.

There is one situation though that comes to mind: Windows Shell extensions. If you are dealing with a set of filesystem objects you might have to deal with PIDLs (pointer to an ID list). These are bizarre little filesystem object abstractions and they need to be explicitly allocated/deallocated using a COM-aware allocator such as CoTaskMemAlloc. There is also an alternative, the IMalloc interface pointer obtained from SHGetMalloc (deprecated) or CoGetMalloc -- it's just an abstraction layer to use, so that your code isn't tied to a specific memory allocator and can use any appropriate one.

The point of using CoTaskMemAlloc or IMalloc rather than malloc() is that the memory allocation/deallocation needs to be something that is "COM-aware" so that its allocation and deallocation are performed consistently at run-time, even if the allocation and deallocation are done by completely unrelated code (e.g. Windows allocates memory, transfers it to your C++ code which later deallocates, or your C++ code allocates, transfers it to someone else's VB code which later deallocates). Neither malloc() nor new are capable of interoperating with the system's run-time heap so you can't use them to allocate memory to transfer to other COM objects, or to receive memory from other COM objects and deallocate.

like image 21
Jason S Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 03:09

Jason S