Code:
// test3.cpp
#include <stack>
using namespace std;
template<typename T>
struct ptr_stack_tp;
template<typename T>
struct ptr_stack_tp<T*> : public stack<T*>
{
~ptr_stack_tp()
{
while (!empty()) {
operator delete(top());
pop();
}
}
};
int main()
{}
Error message (gcc 4.7.2):
test3.cpp: In destructor 'ptr_stack_tp<T*>::~ptr_stack_tp()':
test3.cpp:15:23: error: there are no arguments to 'empty' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'empty' must be available [-fpermissive]
test3.cpp:15:23: note: (if you use '-fpermissive', G++ will accept your code, but allowing the use of an undeclared name is deprecated)
test3.cpp:16:33: error: there are no arguments to 'top' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'top' must be available [-fpermissive]
test3.cpp:17:17: error: there are no arguments to 'pop' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'pop' must be available [-fpermissive]
Functions empty()
, top()
and pop()
are functions of std::stack
, so, why gcc doesn't find them?
You should explicitly invoke base class member functions in a class template through the this
pointer.
// ...
template<typename T>
struct ptr_stack_tp<T*> : public stack<T*>
{
~ptr_stack_tp()
{
while (!this->empty()) {
// ^^^^^^
operator delete(this->top());
// ^^^^^^
this->pop();
// ^^^^^^
}
}
};
// ...
This is due to the way the two-phase name lookup works for templates. Without the this->
indirection, the compiler will look try to resolve unqualified names as names of global functions. Since no global functions named empty()
, top()
, and pop()
exist, the compiler will emit an error.
When you are using this->
, the compiler will delay the name lookup to the moment when the template is actually instantiated: at that point, the function calls to members of the base class will be correctly resolved.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With