I have the following code, which has been stripped down and is I think as minimal as possible that has some very odd behaviour.
The code consists of two source files: One to define some data:
module MyFunction where
data MyFunction =
MyFunction {
functionNumber :: Int,
functionResult :: IO String
}
makeMyFunction :: Show a => Int -> IO a -> MyFunction
makeMyFunction number result = MyFunction {
functionNumber = number,
functionResult = result >>= return . show }
And the other is Main:
module Main (main) where
import System.CPUTime (getCPUTime)
import Data.List (foldl')
import Data.Foldable (foldlM)
import Control.Monad (foldM)
import MyFunction
exampleFunction = do
--let x = foldl' (\a b -> a `seq` (a + b)) 0 [1..20000000] -- This works
--x <- foldlM (\a b -> a `seq` return (a + b)) 0 [1..20000000] -- This works (*)
x <- foldM (\a b -> a `seq` return (a + b)) 0 [1..20000000] -- This doesn't
print x
return ()
runFunction fn = do
result <- functionResult fn
duration <- getCPUTime
if result /= "()"
then putStrLn ""
else return ()
putStrLn (show (fromIntegral duration / (10^9)) ++ "ms")
return fn
main = do
runFunction (makeMyFunction 123 exampleFunction)
return ()
The code as above (compiled using GHC 7.10.3 with stack 1.0.0 with default flags) has a rapid increase in memory usage (exceeding 1GB), and takes typically 3.3 seconds.
If I make a changes to the code, for example:
runFunction
The memory usage will remain minimal, and takes only about 1 second.
One feature that I think is most surprising to me is that replacing foldM
with foldlM
(which as far as I know foldM = foldlM
) fixes the problem.
Also making changes to code that I don't see has any relationship to the problem lines of code also fixes the problem. For example removing the last putStrLn.
Another oddity is that if I merge the MyFunction module into the Main module, while it doesn't fix the problem, it actually causes foldlM
to behave as foldM
using excessive memory.
In the real code that this came from, I have a large number exampleFunction
s, and there is significantly more Main
code, and every so often I encounter this sort of unexplained memory usage from functions, that can usually be resolved by some sort of voodoo.
I'm looking for an explanation for the behaviour. If I know why this occurs I can then look into avoiding it. Could this be a compiler issue, or maybe just a misunderstanding on my part?
(*) I've highlighted the secondary issue that causes the same memory growth to occur with foldlM.
Here is foldlM
from Foldable.hs
(ghc)
-- | Monadic fold over the elements of a structure,
-- associating to the left, i.e. from left to right.
foldlM :: (Foldable t, Monad m) => (b -> a -> m b) -> b -> t a -> m b
foldlM f z0 xs = foldr f' return xs z0
where f' x k z = f z x >>= k
and foldM
from Monad.hs
foldM :: (Foldable t, Monad m) => (b -> a -> m b) -> b -> t a -> m b
{-# INLINEABLE foldM #-}
{-# SPECIALISE foldM :: (a -> b -> IO a) -> a -> [b] -> IO a #-}
{-# SPECIALISE foldM :: (a -> b -> Maybe a) -> a -> [b] -> Maybe a #-}
foldM = foldlM
I placed these definitions to a separate module Test and tested the execution with and without INLINEABLE / SPESIALISE lines. Whatever the reason is, leaving out the SPECIALISE directives helped and the execution time and memory usage was like with foldlM.
After a little bit more digging, removing line
{-# SPECIALISE foldM :: (a -> b -> IO a) -> a -> [b] -> IO a #-}
effected the most.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With