I had a performance issue caused by a wrong xpath ('@' missing in attribute predicate) in a query like this:
select extractvalue(field, '//item[attr="value"]') from table where field1 = :1;
I expected an exception but seems that Oracle accept this particular xpath, has a meaning?
I tried to perform an explain plan against that query but the result is pretty strange, someone can help me to understand it?
I used this code to reproduce the environment
SELECT * FROM V$VERSION;
/*
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
"CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production"
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
*/
create table TMP_TEST_XML(
id number,
content_xml xmltype
);
/
create unique index IDX_TMP_TEST_XML on TMP_TEST_XML(id);
/
declare
xml xmltype := xmltype('<root>
<a key="A">Aaa</a>
<b key="B">Bbb</b>
<c key="C">Ccc</c>
<d key="D">Ddd</d>
<e key="E">Eee</e>
<f key="F">Fff</f>
<g key="G">Ggg</g>
<h key="H">Hhh</h>
<i key="I">Iii</i>
<l key="L">Lll</l>
</root>');
begin
for idx in 1..10000
loop
insert into TMP_TEST_XML values (idx, xml);
end loop;
commit;
end;
/
--explain plan xpath without '@' (wrong)
EXPLAIN PLAN SET statement_id = 'planXml1' FOR
select extractvalue(content_xml, '/root/g[key="G"]') from TMP_TEST_XML where id between 120 and 130;
/
select plan_table_output
from table(dbms_xplan.display('plan_table',null,'advanced'));
/
/*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 24 | 48360 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 4 | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI | | 667K| 2606K| 223K (1)| 00:44:37 |
| 3 | XPATH EVALUATION | | | | | |
|* 4 | XPATH EVALUATION | | | | | |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TMP_TEST_XML | 24 | 48360 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_TMP_TEST_XML | 43 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/
-- explain plan xpath with '@' (correct)
EXPLAIN PLAN SET statement_id = 'planXml1' FOR
select extractvalue(content_xml, '/root/g[@key="G"]') from TMP_TEST_XML where id between 120 and 130;
/
select plan_table_output
from table(dbms_xplan.display('plan_table',null,'advanced'));
/
/*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 24 | 48360 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 4 | | |
|* 2 | XPATH EVALUATION | | | | | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TMP_TEST_XML | 24 | 48360 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_TMP_TEST_XML | 43 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
In the first explain there is a 'nested loops' (row 2) with cardinality 667K that disappeared in the second one. Inserting more records in the same table and performing a new explain plain (without '@') that value is always 667K.
What does it represent that value?
I expected an exception but seems that Oracle accept this particular xpath, has a meaning?
Well, yes. In itself, the xpath /root/g[key="G"]
fetches the node which has a child with tag "key" and value "G". So, even though the extractvalue would fail (more than one node is returned), this would work:
select extract(xmltype('<root>
<a key="A">Aaa</a>
<g key="G"><key>G</key>Ggg</g>
<h key="H">Hhh</h></root>'),'/root/g[key="G"]').getStringVal() from dual;
It returns <g key="G"><key>G</key>Ggg</g>
The high cost could be justified in this kind of search, because attributes are probably more optimized and searchable than other kind of sub-nodes (it can suffice to say that there can be only one with a particular name for each tag, while tags can be repeated multiple times).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With