Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

typedef a type to a pointer

So, normally we typedef to another type or function pointer, but typedef a type to a pointer is strange to me. For example, in winnt.h we got:

typedef void *HANDLE;
typedef PVOID HANDLE;

and PVOID is:

typedef void *PVOID,*LPVOID;

According to that, in the first statement it must be *HANDLE because it's a pointer to void, while PVOID is already a pointer to void, therefore it needs not to be declare as a pointer.

However, what's the benefit of typedef a type to a pointer? Isn't it more confusing?

like image 655
Amumu Avatar asked Nov 01 '11 07:11

Amumu


People also ask

Can we use typedef for function pointer?

A typedef, or a function-type alias, helps to define pointers to executable code within memory. Simply put, a typedef can be used as a pointer that references a function.

Which is the correct method to typedef a function pointer?

h> void upton(int n) { for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) printf("%d\n", i); } void nth(int n) { printf("%d\n, n); } Notice they both are having similar signature. So we can create function pointer which would be able to point both the functions . It can be done by the method given below.

Can you typedef a typedef?

Typedef cannot be used to change the meaning of an existing type name (including a typedef-name). Once declared, a typedef-name may only be redeclared to refer to the same type again.

Can we typedef a function in C?

The typedef is a keyword used in C programming to provide some meaningful names to the already existing variable in the C program. It behaves similarly as we define the alias for the commands.


2 Answers

what's the benefit of typedef a type to a pointer? Isn't it more confusing?

Usually, modules/Libraries need to maintain some internal state for their proper functioning. This internal state needs to be read/verified on every api that is called for this module/library. So the user of the module needs to pass this information to every api they call. But the library implementor do not want that the users of the library be able to see the contents of this maintained statem, because if they are allowed to, someone might play mischief or make honest mitake of modifying the state, and the results of that might be drastic for the module. To avoid such an scenario the modules mask their state maintiaining variables as a void* so that now it is opaque(it's contents are not visible) to users of the module. For benifit of letting the users not being confused about using void * they usually typedef the void *as HANDLE, this is for ease of usage for the clients of the module/library.

As for the mentioned code:

typedef void *PVOID,*LPVOID;

means wherever you mention PVOID henceforth it will be treated as a void * type.
So in,

typedef PVOID HANDLE; 

is equivalent to:

typedef void *HANDLE; 

Because PVOID is nothing but void *.

like image 129
Alok Save Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 21:09

Alok Save


And if you are curious why to use 2 typedefs for the same value, the answer is: they have different meaning and use cases. HANDLE is a handle to an object and PVOID is just pointer to any type. So it's just for better readability.

like image 20
Piotr Kukielka Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 21:09

Piotr Kukielka