Is there any way in C# to create a variable inline? Something like this:
int x = int.TryParse("5", out new int intOutParameter) ? intOutParameter : 0;
Don´t you think that this is more useful than creating a variable outside and then never use it again?
Inline variable declaration (IDE0018)This style rule concerns whether out variables are declared inline or not. Starting in C# 7, you can declare an out variable in the argument list of a method call, rather than in a separate variable declaration.
TryParse(String, NumberStyles, IFormatProvider, Single) Converts the string representation of a number in a specified style and culture-specific format to its single-precision floating-point number equivalent. A return value indicates whether the conversion succeeded or failed.
The Parse method returns the converted number; the TryParse method returns a boolean value that indicates whether the conversion succeeded, and returns the converted number in an out parameter. If the string isn't in a valid format, Parse throws an exception, but TryParse returns false .
That syntax – called declaration expressions – was on the proposed feature list for the next version of C# (version 6).
You're not the only one to think it is useful. For instance making a complete TryParse
call an expression (no need for a statement to declare the variable).
However it has been dropped from the ongoing work to C#6.
I'm sure I'm not the only one hoping it will make a return in a future version.It is included in C#7 as a declaration (no need for new
):
int x = int.TryParse("5", out int intOutParameter) ? intOutParameter : 0;
Inline declarations for out
params is a new suggested feature in C# that might be standard one day, see e.g. Probable C# 6.0 features illustrated, section 9. The expected/proposed syntax:
int.TryParse("5", out int x); // this declares (and assigns) a new variable x
Edit: This out
variable syntax was eventually included in C# 7.0 (Visual Studio 2017); you can also use out var x
.
Addition: People come up with fun extension methods. I tried to make a generic one:
public delegate bool TryParser<TResult>(string s, out TResult result);
public static class FunExtensions
{
public static T TryParse<T>(this string str, TryParser<T> tryParser)
{
T outResult;
tryParser(str, out outResult);
return outResult;
}
}
This can be used like this:
var x = "5".TryParse<int>(int.TryParse);
var y = "01/01".TryParse<DateTime>(DateTime.TryParse);
var z = "bad".TryParse<decimal>(decimal.TryParse);
and so on. I was hoping the compiler would infer T
from usage, so that one could say simply:
var x = "5".TryParse(int.TryParse); // won't compile
but it appears you have to explicitly specify the type argument to the method.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With