Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

TRTTIContext multi-thread issue

Everything I've read indicates that TRTTIContext is thread-safe.

However, TRTTIContext.FindType seems to fail (returns nil) occasionally when multithreading. Using a TCriticalSection around it fixes the issue. Note that I'm using XE6, and the issue doesn't seem to exist in XE. Edit: Seems to exist in all Delphi editions that have the new RTTI units.

I've worked up a test project you can use to see for yourself. Create a new VCL project, drop a TMemo and a TButton, replace unit1 with below, and assign the Form1.OnCreate, Form1.OnDestroy and Button1.OnClick events. The key CS is the GRTTIBlock in TTestThread.Execute. Currently disabled, I get between 3 and 5 failures when I run with 200 threads. Enabling the GRTTIBlock CS removes the failures.

unit Unit1;

interface

uses
  Winapi.Windows, Winapi.Messages, System.SysUtils, System.Variants, System.Classes, Vcl.Graphics,
  Vcl.Controls, Vcl.Forms, Vcl.Dialogs, Vcl.StdCtrls, SyncObjs, Contnrs, RTTI;

type
  TTestThread = class(TThread)
  private
    FFailed: Boolean;
    FRan: Boolean;
    FId: Integer;
  protected
    procedure Execute; override;
  public
    property Failed: Boolean read FFailed;
    property Ran: Boolean read FRan;
    property Id: Integer read FId write FId;
  end;

  TForm1 = class(TForm)
    Memo1: TMemo;
    Button1: TButton;
    procedure Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
    procedure FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
    procedure FormDestroy(Sender: TObject);
  private
    FThreadBlock: TCriticalSection;
    FMaxThreadCount: Integer;
    FThreadCount: Integer;
    FRanCount: Integer;
    FFailureCount: Integer;
    procedure Log(AStr: String);
    procedure ThreadFinished(Sender: TObject);
    procedure LaunchThreads;
  end;

var
  Form1: TForm1;

implementation

var
  GRTTIBlock: TCriticalSection;

{$R *.dfm}

{ TTestThread }

procedure TTestThread.Execute;
var
  ctx : TRTTIContext;
begin
//  GRTTIBlock.Acquire;
  try
    FFailed := not Assigned(ctx.FindType('Unit1.TForm1'));
    FRan := True;
  finally
//    GRTTIBlock.Release;
  end;
end;

{ TForm1 }

procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
  Randomize;
  LaunchThreads;
  Log(Format('Threads: %d, Ran: %d, Failures: %d',
    [FMaxThreadCount, FRanCount, FFailureCount]));
end;

procedure TForm1.FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
begin
  FThreadBlock := TCriticalSection.Create;
end;

procedure TForm1.FormDestroy(Sender: TObject);
begin
  FThreadBlock.Free;
end;

procedure TForm1.Log(AStr: String);
begin
  Memo1.Lines.Add(AStr);
end;

procedure TForm1.ThreadFinished(Sender: TObject);
var
  tt : TTestThread;
begin
  tt := TTestThread(Sender);
  Log(Format('Thread %d finished', [tt.Id]));
  FThreadBlock.Acquire;
  try
    Dec(FThreadCount);
    if tt.Failed then
      Inc(FFailureCount);
    if tt.Ran then
      Inc(FRanCount);
  finally
    FThreadBlock.Release;
  end;
end;

procedure TForm1.LaunchThreads;
var
  c : Integer;
  ol : TObjectList;
  t : TTestThread;
begin
  FRanCount := 0;
  FFailureCount := 0;
  FMaxThreadCount := 200;
  ol := TObjectList.Create(False);
  try
    // get all the thread objects created and ready
    for c := 1 to FMaxThreadCount do
    begin
      t := TTestThread.Create(True);
      t.FreeOnTerminate := True;
      t.OnTerminate := ThreadFinished;
      t.Id := c;
      ol.Add(t);
    end;
    FThreadCount := FMaxThreadCount;
    // start them all up
    for c := 0 to ol.Count - 1 do
    begin
      TTestThread(ol[c]).Start;
      Log(Format('Thread %d started', [TTestThread(ol[c]).Id]));
    end;
    repeat
      Application.ProcessMessages;
      FThreadBlock.Acquire;
      try
        if FThreadCount <= 0 then
          Break;
      finally
        FThreadBlock.Release;
      end;
    until False;
  finally
    ol.Free;
  end;
end;

initialization
  GRTTIBlock := TCriticalSection.Create;

finalization
  GRTTIBlock.Free;

end.
like image 239
Griffyn Avatar asked Dec 08 '14 22:12

Griffyn


2 Answers

As Stefan explains, the problem is down to a faulty implementation of the double checked locking pattern. I'd like to expand on his answer and try to make it more clear what is wrong.

The erroneous code looks like this:

procedure TRealPackage.MakeTypeLookupTable;

  procedure DoMake;
  begin
    TMonitor.Enter(Flock);
    try
      if FNameToType <> nil then // presumes double-checked locking ok
        Exit;

      FNameToType := TDictionary<string,PTypeInfo>.Create;
      // .... code removed from snippet that populates FNameToType
    finally
      TMonitor.Exit(Flock);
    end;
  end;

begin
  if FNameToType <> nil then
    Exit;
  DoMake;
end;

The fault is that the code that populates the shared resource FNameToType is executed after FNameToType has been assigned. That code which populates the shared resource needs to execute before FNameToType is assigned.

Consider two threads, A and B. They are the first threads to call MakeTypeLookupTable. Thread A arrives first, finds that FNameToType is nil and calls DoMake. Thread A acquires the lock and reaches the code that assigns FNameToType. Now, before thread A manages to run any more code, thread B arrives in MakeTypeLookupTable. It tests FNameToType and finds that it is not nil, and so returns immediately. The calling code then makes use of FNameToType. However, FNameToType is not yet in a fit state to use. It has not been populated because thread A has not yet returned.

The most obvious fix from Embarcadero's side looks like this:

procedure DoMake;
var
  LNameToType: TDictionary<string,PTypeInfo>;
begin
  TMonitor.Enter(Flock);
  try
    if FNameToType <> nil then // presumes double-checked locking ok
      Exit;

    LNameToType := TDictionary<string,PTypeInfo>.Create;
    // .... populate LNameToType
    FNameToType := LNameToType;
  finally
    TMonitor.Exit(Flock);
  end;
end;

However, take note of the comment that says presumes double-checked locking ok. Well, double checked locking is fine when the machine has a strong enough memory model. So it's all good on x86 and x64. But ARM has a relatively weak memory model. So I have strong doubts as to whether or not this fix is enough on ARM. Indeed I do wonder where else in the RTL that Embarcadero have used double checked locking.

If TRealPackage had been declared in the interface section of the code then it would be easy enough to patch TRealPackage.MakeTypeLookupTable to apply the change above. However, that is not the case. So in order to apply a work around I suggest the following:

  1. Use a single global RTTI context for all your RTTI code.
  2. In the initialization stage of your program, make a call on that context that in turn forces a call to TRealPackage.MakeTypeLookupTable. Because initialization happens single threaded you avoid the race condition.

Declare the global context like this, say:

var
  ctx: TRttiContext;

And force the call to TRealPackage.MakeTypeLookupTable like this:

ctx.FindType('');

So long as all your RTTI code goes via this single shared context then you cannot fall foul of this race.

like image 197
David Heffernan Avatar answered Oct 06 '22 01:10

David Heffernan


I think I found the problem. It is inside TRealPackage.FindType and MakeTypeLookupTable.

MakeTypeLookupTable checks for FNameToType being assigned. If not it runs DoMake. This one is protected with TMonitor and checks FNameToType being assigned again after entering.

So far so good. But then happens the mistake as inside DoMake FNameToType gets assigned causing other threads to happily pass MakeTypeLookupTable and return to FindType which then does return false in FNameToType.TryGetValue and returns nil.

Fix :

Since FNameToType is used outside of the locked DoMake as indicator that execution can continue it should not be assigned inside DoMake until it's properly filled up.

Edit: Reported as https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-9815

Most recently (as of 2019-Nov) marked as Fixed in Delphi 10.3 Rio.

like image 44
Stefan Glienke Avatar answered Oct 06 '22 00:10

Stefan Glienke