Menu
I am wondering about what the difference between logging and tracing is.
Is the difference basically that tracing is more detailed log giving developers a tool to debug applications at runtime?
I have been experimenting with log4net and doing logging. Now I am wondering if I should be doing tracing as well and if I could/should use log4net for that purpose. Should I be doing tracing with log4net and is there some trace level for log4net loggers? Should I use a different log level for debug and trace purposes or is it ok to use the same? Can you give a simple example on how I would do logging and tracing for a simple method?
Edit: Despite a few helpful answers below I am still unsure how I should be doing tracing versus logging.
I have the following method in my Business layer and I want to add logging/tracing to it. I am wondering how to do it efficiently. Is the following method acceptable in terms of logging/tracing? Should the log messages be of type Info instead of Debug? Are the Debug messages I am logging considered trace? How would you change it?
IEnumerable<Car> GetCars() { try { logger.Debug("Getting cars"); IEnumerable<Car> cars = CarAccessor.GetCars().ConvertAll(DataAccessToBusinessConverter); logger.Debug("Got total of " + cars.Count + " cars"); } catch (Exception e) { logger.Error("Error when getting cars", e); throw new Exception("Unexpected error when getting cars"); } }
947
While logs provide information about what happened inside the service, distributed tracing tells you what happened between services/components and their relationships. This is extremely important for microservices, where many issues are caused due to the failed integration between components.
log4net doesn't support the concept of structured logging. Like shown in the conversionPattern element in the XML configuration, you have some variables to play with when writing to the storage. But including properties like FirstName in the Serilog example isn't available.
Logs capture the state of the application and are the most basic form of monitoring. Tracing is beneficial when you have a request which spans across multiple systems. A trace tells you how long a request took, which components it interacted with, and the latency introduced during each step.
In contrast to message logs, in which records are made of noteworthy events that have occurred, trace logs capture transient information about the current operating environment when a component or application fails to operate as intended.
Log4Net is a richer and more flexible way of tracing or logging than the in-built Trace, or even ASP Health Monitoring. Like Diagnostics.Trace you configure event listeners ("appenders") in config. For simple tracing, the use is simple like the inbuilt Trace. The decision to use Log4Net is whether you have more complicated requirements.
In ASP.NET, there is a special version of Trace (System.Web.TraceContext) will writes to the bottom of the ASP page or Trace.axd. In ASP.NET 2+, there is also a fuller logging framework called Health Monitoring. Log4Net is a richer and more flexible way of tracing or logging than the in-built Trace, or even ASP Health Monitoring.
Logging is the generic term for recording information - tracing is the specific form of logging used to debug. In .NET the System.Diagnostics.Trace and System.Diagnostics.Debug objects allow simple logging to a number of "event listeners" that you can configure in app.config.
You can specify in your log4net config which log4net logging levels you want to log. This is really valuable if you want to specify only certain levels to be logged to a specific log appender or to reduce logging in production. This allows you to log more or less data without changing your code.
Logging is the generic term for recording information - tracing is the specific form of logging used to debug.
In .NET the System.Diagnostics.Trace and System.Diagnostics.Debug objects allow simple logging to a number of "event listeners" that you can configure in app.config. You can also use TraceSwitches to configure and filter (between errors and info levels, for instance).
private void TestMethod(string x) { if(x.Length> 10) { Trace.Write("String was " + x.Length); throw new ArgumentException("String too long"); } } In ASP.NET, there is a special version of Trace (System.Web.TraceContext) will writes to the bottom of the ASP page or Trace.axd. In ASP.NET 2+, there is also a fuller logging framework called Health Monitoring.
Log4Net is a richer and more flexible way of tracing or logging than the in-built Trace, or even ASP Health Monitoring. Like Diagnostics.Trace you configure event listeners ("appenders") in config. For simple tracing, the use is simple like the inbuilt Trace. The decision to use Log4Net is whether you have more complicated requirements.
private void TestMethod(string x) { Log.Info("String length is " + x.Length); if(x.Length> 10) { Log.Error("String was " + x.Length); throw new ArgumentException("String too long"); } } IMO...
Logging should not be designed for development debugging (but it inevitably gets used that way)
Logging should be designed for operational monitoring and trouble-shooting -- this is its raison d’être.
Tracing should be designed for development debugging & performance tuning. If available in the field, it can be use for really low-level operational trouble-shooting, but that is not its main purpose
Given this, the most successful approaches I've seen (and designed/implemented) in the past do not combine the two together. Better to keep the two tools separate, each doing one job as well as possible.
24
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
