This question is about functions that take arrays of statically known size.
Take for example the following minimal program:
#include <iostream>
template<size_t N>
void arrfun_a(int a[N])
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i)
std::cout << a[i]++ << " ";
}
int main()
{
int a[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
arrfun_a<5>(a);
std::cout << std::endl;
arrfun_a<5>(a);
return 0;
}
Which, when run, prints the expected result:
2 3 4 5 6
3 4 5 6 7
However, when I tried to have my compiler (VS 2010) deduce the 5
, it could not deduce template argument for 'int [n]' from 'int [5]'
.
A bit of research resulted in the updated arrfun_b
where the template parameter deduction works:
template<size_t n>
void arrfun_b(int (&a)[n])
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < n; ++i)
std::cout << ++(a[i]) << std::endl;
}
The result of the program is the same, whether arrfun_a
or arrfun_b
is called.
So far, the only difference I have found is whether the template argument deduction works and if it is possible to call the function with an N that is not 5...
The compiler silently changes the type of function argument int a[N]
to int *a
and thus loses the size of the array. int(&a)[5]
is truly a reference to an array of size 5, and cannot be passed an array of any other size.
I think its the difference between a reference and a pointer.
arrfun_a passes a pointer to int.
arrfun_b passes a reference to an array of ints.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With