Template specialization vs. Compiler optimization

Question

I have a class with a boolean template argument.

template<bool b>
class Foo {
  void doFoo();
};

I want doFoo to do different things based on the value of b.

Naively I could write

Option 1

template<bool b> void Foo<b>::doFoo() {
  if (b) cout << "hello";
  else cout << "goodbye";
}

This seems inefficient to me because I have to execute an if every time the function is called event though the correct branch should be known at compile time. I could fix this with template specialization:

Option 2

template<> void Foo<true>::doFoo() { cout << "hello"; }
template<> void Foo<false>::doFoo() { cout << "goodbye"; }

This way I don't have any conditionals executed in runtime. This solution is a bit more complicated (especially since in my real code the class has several template arguments and you can't partially specialize functions so I will need to wrap the function in a class).

My question is, is the compiler smart enough to know not to execute the conditional in option 1 since it always executes the same way or do I need to write the specializations? If the compiler is smart enough I would be happy to know if this is compiler dependent or a language feature that I can rely on?

Answer 1

The compiler will probably optimize the branch away since it is known at compile time what b is. This is not guaranteed though and the only way to know for sure is to check the assembly.

If you can use C++17 you can use if constexpr and that guarantees only one branch will exist.