template specialization multiply defined symbols

Question

I know I'm missing something easy here but I've got a templated member function of a class which I've specialised.

class MyClass
{
    template<typename T> T GetTFromVariable(shared_ptr<TOtSimpleVariable> v, string s);
}

template<typename T>
T MyClass::GetTFromVariable(shared_ptr<TOtSimpleVariable> v, string s)
{
    throw std::runtime_error("Don't know how to convert " + ToString(v->GetString()));
}

template<>
int MyClass::GetTFromVariable<int>(shared_ptr<TOtSimpleVariable> v, string s)
{
    return v->GetInteger();
}

template<>
string MyClass::GetTFromVariable<string>(shared_ptr<TOtSimpleVariable> v, string s)
{
    return v->GetString();
}

// etc for other specialisations.

This is defined in my header file (as templates should be) but when I go to compile, I get a bunch of multiple defined symbols errors, such as:

OtCustomZenith_logic.lib(PtPathOutput.obj) : error LNK2005: "public: class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > __thiscall MyClass::GetTFromVariable<class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > >(class boost::shared_ptr<class TOtSimpleVariable>,class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >)" (??$GetTFromVariable@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@@CommandProperties@@QAE?AV?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@V?$shared_ptr@VTOtSimpleVariable@@@boost@@V12@@Z) already defined in TableFareSystem_test.obj

I can fix it by inlining the method but I don't think that should be necessary... what am I missing?

EDIT: I'm using Visual Studio 2010

Answer 1

The full specialization is no longer a template. It's a concrete function. As such it needs to be (implicitly or explicitly) declared inline. The easiest is to add that keyword before the return type specification.

That said, the presented code does not correspond to your error message.

Your error message talks about return type std::string, not return type int.

Answer 2

As Alf noted, the full specialization is no longer a template. However, I am not sure it has to be defined inline. You should also be able to split the declaration and definition.

I.e. In your header have:

template<> 
int MyClass::GetTFromVariable<int>(shared_ptr<TOtSimpleVariable> v, string s);

and in the implementation have:

template<>
int MyClass::GetTFromVariable<int>(shared_ptr<TOtSimpleVariable> v, string s)
{
    return v->GetInteger();
}

I also had thought that by rights the templated definition should also be explicitly inline (I always have done so) but would not be too surprised if a given compiler was lax in applying the ODR for templates. I'd be interested to see the standard reference that states otherwise.