I am befuddled why this is allowed
public class Foo {
class Bar extends Foo {
}
}
Yet this is not allowed
public class Foo {
class Bar extends Foo {
}
class Fooey extends Bar {
}
}
The compiler informed that it can not reference Fooey.this before supertype constructor has been called.
And this is allowed
public class Foo {
static class Bar extends Foo {
}
class Fooey extends Bar {
}
}
What is going on here? And where can I go to find more information on how inner class inheritance works?
EDIT I came upon both rather poor ideas; inner class extends outer class and inner class extends other static inner class. I wasn't sure what exactly was going and how I should refactor this. I ended up just yanking out the inner classes and encapsulating them in the outer class.
An instance of InnerClass can exist only within an instance of OuterClass and has direct access to the methods and fields of its enclosing instance.
To instantiate an inner class, you must first instantiate the outer class. Then, create the inner object within the outer object with this syntax: OuterClass. InnerClass innerObject = outerObject.
A class that is defined within another class is called a nested class. An inner class, on the other hand, is a non-static type, a particular specimen of a nested class.
Unlike a class, an inner class can be private and once you declare an inner class private, it cannot be accessed from an object outside the class.
First of all: Don't do this sort of thing. It's evil. Really, Java 1.1 should have been specified very much more restrictively, IMO.
There is confusion about which this
to use from the Foo.Fooey
constructor. The outer this (Foo.this
) would work. But the actual this
is a Foo
but it can't be passed to the superconstructor because of rules about using this
before the superconstructor returns (and besides having an outer instance the same instance as the inner instance is fecked up). The outer this on the superclass "((Bar)this).this$0
" (IIRC), is also inaccessible due to restrictions on use of this
.
The solution is to be explicit. Explicit is usually a good thing in my book (unless it becomes boilerplate).
public class Foo {
class Bar extends Foo {
}
class Fooey extends Bar {
Fooey() {
Foo.this.super();
}
}
}
Better yet, don't have an inner class extend its own outer class, or extend any inner class.
I guess the JLS and the answers to this question are a starting point
Java inner class and static nested class
Inner Classes and Enclosing Instances
Tom Hawtin answer is correct.
Have also a look at java puzzler. The sample chapter contains this case and a few other "interesting" case you may want to have a look at.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With