I'm using Qt 5.2.1 with Windows 8.1.
I'm facing a strange behavior regarding QTimer
accuracy on Windows 8.1.
I'm starting a timer which is supposed to timeout every 20 milliseconds. To check that, I also use a QTime object to measure the elapsed time between two ticks.
If I start the timer with an interval of 20ms, I measure an effective interval of 30ms. If I start the timer with an interval of 19ms, I measure an effective interval of 19ms !
Here is a small project producing the problem :
main.cpp :
#include "mainfrm.h"
#include <QApplication>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
QApplication a(argc, argv);
MainFrm w(20);
w.setMinimumSize(400,50);
w.show();
MainFrm w2(19);
w2.setMinimumSize(400,50);
w2.show();
return a.exec();
}
mainfrm.h
#ifndef WIDGET_H
#define WIDGET_H
#include <QLabel>
#include <QTime>
#include <QTimer>
class MainFrm : public QLabel {
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit MainFrm(int TimerInterval = 20, QWidget *parent = 0);
private:
QTime m_LastUpdateTime;
QTimer m_TickTimer;
unsigned int m_ElapsedSum;
unsigned int m_TickCount;
private slots:
void onTick();
};
#endif // WIDGET_H
mainfrm.cpp
#include "mainfrm.h"
MainFrm::MainFrm(int TimerInterval, QWidget *parent) : QLabel(parent) {
m_ElapsedSum = 0;
m_TickCount = 0;
m_TickTimer.setInterval(TimerInterval);
connect(&m_TickTimer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(onTick()));
m_TickTimer.start();
}
void MainFrm::onTick() {
int ElapsedTime = m_LastUpdateTime.elapsed();
m_LastUpdateTime.start();
if (ElapsedTime < 1) ElapsedTime = 1;
m_ElapsedSum += ElapsedTime;
m_TickCount++;
this->setText(QString("FPS : %1, Elapsed : %2ms, Mean : %3ms, Remaining time : %4")
.arg(1000/ElapsedTime)
.arg(ElapsedTime)
.arg(m_ElapsedSum/m_TickCount)
.arg(m_TickTimer.remainingTime()));
}
This code opens two windows (overlapping), the first one with a timer with an interval of 19ms. The accuracy is fine. The second one is using a timer with an interval of 20ms. The accuracy is bad.
I compiled the same code on Linux (Ubuntu 12.04) and everything is fine. The accuracy is fine for both intervals.
I really don't understand why I get this problem on Windows. I know Windows cannot guarantee a high accuracy (and I don't need it), but why is it able to cope with an interval of 19ms and not 20ms ?
Is there a bug in my code ?
Here is a zip-file containing a Qt project : testtimer.zip
Have you looked at the QTimer precision setting?
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/qtimer.html#timerType-prop
It defaults to coarse precision.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With