If I write two SELECT
statements in a IF EXISTS
condition with a AND
clause in between these select queries, does both queries get executed even if the first SELECT
returns false?
IF EXISTS (SELECT....) AND EXISTS(SELECT ....)
BEGIN
END
Does the SQL Server Engine execute both the SQL Statement in this scenario?
Thanks Krish
Syntax. IF (a <= 20) THEN c:= c+1; END IF; If the Boolean expression condition evaluates to true, then the block of code inside the if statement will be executed. If the Boolean expression evaluates to false, then the first set of code after the end of the if statement (after the closing end if) will be executed.
This is why you can nest IF ELSE in SQL query statements. It is demonstrated below: DECLARE @age INT; SET @age = 60; IF @age < 18 PRINT 'underage'; ELSE BEGIN IF @age < 50 PRINT 'You are below 50'; ELSE PRINT 'Senior'; END; In this example, the code will print underage if the value of @age is below 18.
Conditional statements are used to define what logic is to be executed based on the status of some condition being satisfied.
I would rewrite the test as
IF CASE
WHEN EXISTS (SELECT ...) THEN CASE
WHEN EXISTS (SELECT ...) THEN 1
END
END = 1
This guarantees short circuiting as described here but does mean you need to select the cheapest one to evaluate up front rather than leaving it up to the optimiser.
In my extremely limited tests below the following seemed to hold true when testing
EXISTS AND EXISTS
The EXISTS AND EXISTS
version seems most problematic. This chains together some outer semi joins. In none of the cases did it re-arrange the order of the tests to try and do the cheaper one first (an issue discussed in the second half of this blog post). In the IF ...
version it wouldn't have made any difference if it had as it did not short circuit. However when this combined predicate is put in a WHERE
clause the plan changes and it does short circuit so that rearrangement could have been beneficial.
/*All tests are testing "If False And False"*/
IF EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=2)
AND EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)=1)
PRINT 'Y'
/*
Table 'spt_values'. Scan count 1, logical reads 9
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
IF EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)=1)
AND EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=2)
PRINT 'Y'
/*
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
Table 'spt_values'. Scan count 1, logical reads 9
*/
SELECT 1
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=2)
AND EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)=1)
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
SELECT 1
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)=1)
AND EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=2)
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_values'. Scan count 1, logical reads 9
*/
The plans for all these appear very similar. The reason for the difference in behaviour between the SELECT 1 WHERE ...
version and the IF ...
version is that for the former one if the condition is false then the correct behaviour is to return no result so it just chains the OUTER SEMI JOINS
and if one is false then zero rows carry forward to the next one.
However the IF
version always needs to return a result of 1 or zero. This plan uses a probe column in its outer joins and sets this to false if the EXISTS
test is not passed (rather than simply discarding the row). This means that there is always 1 row feeding into the next Join and it always gets executed.
The CASE
version has a very similar plan but it uses a PASSTHRU
predicate which it uses to skip execution of the JOIN if the previous THEN
condition was not met. I'm not sure why combined AND
s wouldn't use the same approach.
EXISTS OR EXISTS
The EXISTS OR EXISTS
version used a concatenation (UNION ALL
) operator as the inner input to an outer semi join. This arrangement means that it can stop requesting rows from the inner side as soon as the first one is returned (i.e. it can effectively short circuit) All 4 queries ended up with the same plan where the cheaper predicate was evaluated first.
/*All tests are testing "If True Or True"*/
IF EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=1)
OR EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)<>1)
PRINT 'Y'
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
IF EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)<>1)
OR EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)= 1)
PRINT 'Y'
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
SELECT 1
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)= 1)
OR EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)<>1)
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
SELECT 1
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)<>1)
OR EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=1)
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
ELSE
It did occur to me to try De Morgan's law to convert AND
to OR
and see if that made any difference. Converting the first query gives
IF NOT ((NOT EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=2)
OR NOT EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)=1)))
PRINT 'Y'
ELSE
PRINT 'N'
/*
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
Table 'spt_values'. Scan count 1, logical reads 9
*/
So this still doesn't make any difference to the short circuiting behaviour. However if you remove the NOT
and reverse the order of the IF ... ELSE
conditions it now does short circuit!
IF (NOT EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_monitor HAVING COUNT(*)=2)
OR NOT EXISTS (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM master..spt_values HAVING COUNT(*)=1))
PRINT 'N'
ELSE
PRINT 'Y'
/*
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0
Table 'spt_monitor'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1
*/
I believe you can rely on the short-circuiting behavior of IF statements in most, if not all, modern languages. You could try testing by putting a true condition first and replacing your second condition with 1/0
which would give you a divide by zero error if short circuiting doesn't occur, like so:
IF 1>0 OR 1/0 BEGIN
PRINT 'Short Circuited'
END
If you don't trust that, you could always rewrite your query to do this:
IF EXISTS(SELECT...) BEGIN
IF EXISTS(SELECT...) BEGIN
...
END
END
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With