Why is the output of this code :
#include <iostream>
template<typename T> void f(T param)
{
std::cout << "General" << std::endl ;
}
template<> void f(int& param)
{
std::cout << "int&" << std::endl ;
}
int main()
{
float x ; f (x) ;
int y ; f (y) ;
int& z = y ; f (z) ;
}
is
General
General
General
The third one is surprizing because the function was specialized exactly for int&
Edit : I know that overloading might be a proper solution. I just want to learn the logic behind it.
The type of both the expression y
and the expression z
is int
. A reference appearing in an expression won't keep reference type. Instead, the type of the expression will be the referenced type, with the expression being an lvalue.
So in both cases, T
is deduced to int
, and thus the explicit specialization is not used at all.
What's important to note (other than that you should really use overloading, as another guy said), is that you have a non-reference function parameter in your template. Before any deduction of T
against the argument type is done, the argument type will be converted from arrays to a pointer to their first element (for functions, arguments will be converted to function pointers). So a function template with a non-reference function parameter doesn't allow for accurate deduction anyway.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With