Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Since .NET has a garbage collector why do we need finalizers/destructors/dispose-pattern?

If I understand correctly the .net runtime will always clean up after me. So if I create new objects and I stop referencing them in my code, the runtime will clean up those objects and free the memory they occupied.

Since this is the case why then do some objects need to have a destructor or dispose method? Won’t the runtime clean up after them when they are not referenced anymore?

like image 712
J A Avatar asked Dec 01 '08 18:12

J A


People also ask

Why we need to implement Dispose method while we have option to implement destructor?

It is always recommended to use Dispose method to clean unmanaged resources. You should not implement the Finalize method until it is extremely necessary. At runtime C#, C++ destructors are automatically converted to Finalize method.

Why do we need Dispose in C#?

In the context of C#, dispose is an object method invoked to execute code required for memory cleanup and release and reset unmanaged resources, such as file handles and database connections.

How does the .NET garbage collector work?

The garbage collector serves as an automatic memory manager. When there isn't enough memory to allocate an object, the GC must collect and dispose of garbage memory to make memory available for new allocations. This process is known as garbage collection.

Does garbage collector call Dispose C#?

The GC does not call Dispose , it calls your finalizer (which you should make call Dispose(false) ).


2 Answers

Finalizers are needed to guarantee the release of scarce resources back into the system like file handles, sockets, kernel objects, etc. Since the finalizer always runs at the end of the objects life, it’s the designated place to release those handles.

The Dispose pattern is used to provide deterministic destruction of resources. Since the .net runtime garbage collector is non-deterministic (which means you can never be sure when the runtime will collect old objects and call their finalizer), a method was needed to ensure the deterministic release of system resources. Therefore, when you implement the Dispose pattern properly you provide deterministic release of the resources and in cases where the consumer is careless and does not dispose the object, the finalizer will clean up the object.

A simple example of why Dispose is needed might be a quick and dirty log method:

public void Log(string line) {     var sw = new StreamWriter(File.Open(         "LogFile.log", FileMode.OpenOrCreate, FileAccess.Write, FileShare.None));      sw.WriteLine(line);      // Since we don't close the stream the FileStream finalizer will do that for      // us but we don't know when that will be and until then the file is locked. } 

In the above example, the file will remain locked until the garbage collector calls the finalizer on the StreamWriter object. This presents a problem since, in the meantime, the method might be called again to write a log, but this time it will fail because the file is still locked.

The correct way is to dispose the object when are done using it:

public void Log(string line) {     using (var sw = new StreamWriter(File.Open(         "LogFile.log", FileMode.OpenOrCreate, FileAccess.Write, FileShare.None))) {          sw.WriteLine(line);     }      // Since we use the using block (which conveniently calls Dispose() for us)     // the file well be closed at this point. } 

BTW, technically finalizers and destructors mean the same thing; I do prefer to call c# destructors 'finalizers' since otherwise they tend to confuse people with C++ destructors, which unlike C#, are deterministic.

like image 198
Yona Avatar answered Sep 19 '22 12:09

Yona


The previous answers are good but let me emphasize the important point here once again. In particular, you said that

If I understand correctly the .net runtime will always clean up after me.

This is only partly correct. In fact, .NET only offers automatic management for one particular resource: main memory. All other resources need manual cleanup.1)

Oddly, main memory gets special status in almost all discussions about program resources. There's of course a good reason for this – main memory is often the scarcest resource. But it's worth remembering that there are other types of resources as well, that also need managing.


1) The usual attempted solution is to couple the lifetime of other resources to the lifetime of memory locations or identifiers in the code – hence the existence of finalizers.

like image 24
Konrad Rudolph Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 12:09

Konrad Rudolph