I'm trying to understand two things:
SimpleDateFormat
is not lenient)Here's the code
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Calendar;
import java.util.Date;
public class TestDate {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
SimpleDateFormat format = new SimpleDateFormat("dd/MM/yyyy");
format.setLenient(false);
Date date = format.parse("01/01/13"); // Since this only has a 2 digit year, I would expect an exception to be thrown
System.out.println(date); // Prints Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 GMT 13
Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance();
cal.setTime(date);
System.out.println(cal.get(Calendar.YEAR)); // Prints 13
}
}
If it makes a difference, I'm using java 1.6.0_38-b05 on Ubuntu
Class SimpleDateFormat. Deprecated. A class for parsing and formatting dates with a given pattern, compatible with the Java 6 API.
2.2.Date formats are not synchronized. It is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread. If multiple threads access a format concurrently, it must be synchronized externally. So SimpleDateFormat instances are not thread-safe, and we should use them carefully in concurrent environments.
DateTimeFormatter is a replacement for the old SimpleDateFormat that is thread-safe and provides additional functionality.
The formats are case-sensitive. Use yyyy for year, dd for day of month and MM for month. You need to read the javadoc of SimpleDateFormat more carefully, Take special care for lower-case and upper-case in the patterns.
SimpleDateFormat API:
For parsing, if the number of pattern letters is more than 2, the year is interpreted literally, regardless of the number of digits. So using the pattern "MM/dd/yyyy", "01/11/12" parses to Jan 11, 12 A.D.
As for lenient, when it's set to false parse throws exception for invalid dates, eg 01/32/12, while in lenient mode this date is treated as 02/01/12. SimpleDateFormat uses Calendar internally, details about leniency can be found in Calendar API.
Question 1. This is a partial duplicate of Why Does Java's SimpleDateFormat parse this. The second answer on the question answers this nicely. The crux of it is this:
Number: For parsing, the number of pattern letters is ignored unless it's needed to separate two adjacent fields. Year: During parsing, only strings consisting of exactly two digits […] will be parsed into the default century. Any other numeric string, such as a one digit string, a three or more digit string, or a two digit string that isn't all digits (for example, "-1"), is interpreted literally. So "01/02/3" or "01/02/003" are parsed, using the same pattern
Question 2. Look carefully: your input format is not the same as the format that you are passing to the function.
new SimpleDateFormat("dd/MM/yyyy");
vs.
format.parse("01/01/13");
Either parse to 01/01/2013
or use the date forat 'dd/MM/yy'
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With