Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Signal handling with multiple threads in Linux

People also ask

Where should a signal be delivered for multi threaded?

For multithreaded programs, sigwait(2) is the preferred interface to use, because it deals so well with aysynchronously generated signals. sigwait() causes the calling thread to wait until any signal identified by its set argument is delivered to the thread.

Are signal handlers per thread?

signal is a per process call, not a per thread one, if you call it it sets the handler for all threads in the process. Signals and threads is a complex topic.

How does Linux support multi threading?

In Linux terminology, simultaneous multithreading is also known as SMT or Hyper-Threading. With multithreading enabled, a single core on the hardware is mapped to multiple logical CPUs on Linux. Thus, multiple threads can issue instructions to a core simultaneously during each cycle.

How do you signal between threads?

The common ways of signalling are through WaitHandle and Monitor , that can coordinate between threads by notifying (signal) them when to go ahead and when to halt. All the EventWaitHandle mentioned below are basically WaitHandle objects that can signal and wait for signals.


pthreads(7) describes that POSIX.1 requires all threads in a process share attributes, including:

  • signal dispositions

POSIX.1 also requires some attributes to be distinct for each thread, including:

  • signal mask (pthread_sigmask(3))

  • alternate signal stack (sigaltstack(2))

The Linux kernel's complete_signal routine has the following code block -- the comments are quite useful:

/*
 * Now find a thread we can wake up to take the signal off the queue.
 *
 * If the main thread wants the signal, it gets first crack.
 * Probably the least surprising to the average bear.
 */
if (wants_signal(sig, p))
        t = p;
else if (!group || thread_group_empty(p))
        /*
         * There is just one thread and it does not need to be woken.
         * It will dequeue unblocked signals before it runs again.
         */
        return;
else {
        /*
         * Otherwise try to find a suitable thread.
         */
        t = signal->curr_target;
        while (!wants_signal(sig, t)) {
                t = next_thread(t);
                if (t == signal->curr_target)
                        /*
                         * No thread needs to be woken.
                         * Any eligible threads will see
                         * the signal in the queue soon.
                         */
                        return;
        }
        signal->curr_target = t;
}

/*
 * Found a killable thread.  If the signal will be fatal,
 * then start taking the whole group down immediately.
 */
if (sig_fatal(p, sig) &&
    !(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) &&
    !sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig) &&
    (sig == SIGKILL || !p->ptrace)) {
        /*
         * This signal will be fatal to the whole group.
         */

So, you see that you are in charge of where signals are delivered:

If your process has set a signal's disposition to SIG_IGN or SIG_DFL, then the signal is ignored (or default -- kill, core, or ignore) for all threads.

If your process has set a signal's disposition to a specific handler routine, then you can control which thread will receive the signals by manipulating specific thread signal masks using pthread_sigmask(3). You can nominate one thread to manage them all, or create one thread per signal, or any mixture of these options for specific signals, or you rely on the Linux kernel's current default behavior of delivering the signal to the main thread.

Some signals, however, are special according to the signal(7) man page:

A signal may be generated (and thus pending) for a process as a whole (e.g., when sent using kill(2)) or for a specific thread (e.g., certain signals, such as SIGSEGV and SIGFPE, generated as a consequence of executing a specific machine-language instruction are thread directed, as are signals targeted at a specific thread using pthread_kill(3)). A process-directed signal may be delivered to any one of the threads that does not currently have the signal blocked. If more than one of the threads has the signal unblocked, then the kernel chooses an arbitrary thread to which to deliver the signal.


This is slightly nuanced, based on which version of the Linux kernel you are using.

Assuming 2.6 posix threads, and if you are talking about the OS sending SIGTERM or SIGHUP, the signal is sent to process, which is received by and handled by root thread. Using POSIX threads, you can also sent SIGTERM to individual threads as well, but I suspect you are asking about what happens when the OS sends the signal to the process.

In 2.6, SIGTERM will cause child threads to exit "cleanly", where as 2.4, child threads were left in an indeterminate state.