Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Show custom text for applied file type filters on file dialog to upload particular category of files

The following will allow users to select only specified category of image files.

<input id="file" type="file" name="file" size="30"         accept="image/jpg,image/png,image/jpeg,image/gif" /> 

But, the problem is it would show "Custom Files" as file description in the file dialog which will confuse users about what type of file they should select.

filedialogbottom

My question is: Is there a better way I can modify the text "Custom Files" to "Image Files"

Note: If I provide "image/*" that would show "Image Files" in file description, but I DO NOT WANT TO ALLOW user to select ALL types of image files, just wanna restrict to specified formats.

Thanks for your opinion in advance.

like image 222
dhruvpatel Avatar asked Feb 03 '14 18:02

dhruvpatel


People also ask

How can set upload file in HTML?

First create an input element, here you could apply the file type to the accept attribute but for the example it will allow you to select all file types. Next we need to listen to the 'change' event on the input element. var upload = document. querySelector('input[type="file"]'); upload.


1 Answers

The short answer

As I expected it turns out this is not possible. The <input type="file" /> is one of the most protected browser elements and hence least adaptable browser elements around. The reason for that browsers handle file inputs with so much care is because they wouldn't want to risk attackers accessing your files (even seeing your folder structure would be bad).

The long answer

You might not be able to freely change the text visible in the filter box, but there is hope. In fact, in some situations it is possible to kind of choose the text that appears. One big drawback is that this is totally not browser-compatible and probably not OS-compatible.

There is also another reason why it might be a bad idea for browsers to allow editing that text, it could be used to mislead users (for example a text like We're watching you or FATAL WINDOWS ERROR could scare users).

Furthermore it should not, but could lead to possible exploits where users try to run some sort of C-code in the field (e.g. by trying to trigger some out of bounds writes), granting them machine access, possibly harming your computer in catastrophic ways. Most browsers implement the open file window through calling native operating system functions or ABI's, hence extra care is needed, because these instances of ABI calls could lead to sandbox escapes and/or kernel exploits. Usually it is a good idea to keep user input as far away as possible from kernel calls as possible and that is exactly what browser vendors do in this case (e.g. hardcoded in firefox source code and hardcoded in chrome source code).

Above I said that it is somewhat possible to change the visible filter-text. Below I handle some of the things I tried, but don't hesitate to try this for yourself on this codepen I created for testing purposes: https://codepen.io/JohannesB/pen/vKGoyE

Possible inspiration for other file-types I did not test (feel free to edit this post): https://stackoverflow.com/a/14839673/1493235

Selection of file accept-parameters that I believe could yield intresting results: application/msword, application/rtf, application/octet-stream, application/octet-stream exe, application/zip, text/css, text/html, text/plain

Notable conclusions

  • All three browsers differ in the file types associated with image/*, video/* and audio/*
  • Internet explorer is the only browser that understands Video/x-msvideo avi
  • Firefox and chrome understand Aplication/pdf with a custom filter text, but IE does noet.
  • Chrome is the only browser that understand Text/* and that has a custom text caption for .exe
  • Custom filter captions never apply for combined accept inputs, in absolutely none of the browser.

A path not investigated

It might be possible that for flash uploaders this text is customizable, but I highly doubt it. Also, flash is deprecated, so in my opinion it's not worth trying.


The experiment results

Disclaimer: The examples used below were run on a Windows 7 machine, using Internet Explorer v11.0.9600, Chrome v51.0.2704.84m and Firefox v46.0.1. I cannot guarantee that they represent correct information on other operating systems, other browser versions or even the same browser versions. Use this information with care.


Internet explorer

Audio/*

IE Audio/*

Application/*

IE Application/*

Application/pdf

IE Application/pdf

Image/*

IE Image/*

Text/*

IE Text/*

Video/*

IE Video/*

Video/x-msvideo avi

IE Video/x-msvideo avi

.exe

IE .exe

Image/*, Video/*

IE Image/, Video/

Image/*, .exe

IE Image/*, .exe


Chrome

Audio/*

Chrome Audio/*

Application/*

Chrome Application/*

Application/pdf

Chrome Application/pdf

Image/*

Chrome Image/*

Text/*

Chrome Text/*

Video/*

Chrome Video/*

Video/x-msvideo avi

Chrome Video/x-msvideo avi

.exe

Chrome .exe

Image/*, Video/*

Chrome Image/, Video/

Image/*, .exe

Chrome Image/*, .exe


Mozilla Firefox

Audio/*

Mozilla Firefox Audio/*

Application/*

Mozilla Firefox Application/*

Application/pdf

Mozilla Firefox Application/pdf

Image/*

Mozilla Firefox Image/*

Text/*

Mozilla Firefox Text/*

Video/*

Mozilla Firefox Video/*

Video/x-msvideo avi

Mozilla Firefox Video/x-msvideo avi

.exe

Mozilla Firefox .exe

Image/*, Video/*

Mozilla Firefox Image/, Video/

Image/*, .exe

Mozilla Firefox Image/*, .exe

like image 190
JohannesB Avatar answered Sep 21 '22 07:09

JohannesB