I've just started CUDA programming and it's going quite nicely, my GPUs are recognized and everything. I've partially set up Intellisense in Visual Studio using this extremely helpful guide here: http://www.ademiller.com/blogs/tech/2010/10/visual-studio-2010-adding-intellisense-support-for-cuda-c/
and here: http://www.ademiller.com/blogs/tech/2011/05/visual-studio-2010-and-cuda-easier-with-rc2/
However, Intellisense still doesn't pick up on kernel calls like this:
// KernelCall.cu #include <iostream> #include "cuda.h" #include "cuda_runtime.h" #include "device_launch_parameters.h" __global__ void kernel(void){} int main() { kernel<<<1,1>>>(); system("pause"); return 0; }
The line kernel<<<1,1>>>() is underlined in red, specifically the one arrow to the left of the first one with the error reading "Error: expected and expression". However, if I hover over the function, its return type and parameters are displayed properly. It still compiles just fine, I'm just wondering how to get rid of this little annoyance.
Remote Development SupportNsight Visual Studio Code Edition enables developers to implement CUDA code in various cluster environments such as Virtual Machines or remote Docker containers. It also supports code development for Linux systems via the Remote – WSL extension.
Most CUDA calls are synchronous (often called “blocking”). An example of a blocking call is cudaMemcpy().
Wow, lots of dust on this thread. I came up with a macro fix (well, more like workaround...) for this that I thought I would share:
// nvcc does not seem to like variadic macros, so we have to define // one for each kernel parameter list: #ifdef __CUDACC__ #define KERNEL_ARGS2(grid, block) <<< grid, block >>> #define KERNEL_ARGS3(grid, block, sh_mem) <<< grid, block, sh_mem >>> #define KERNEL_ARGS4(grid, block, sh_mem, stream) <<< grid, block, sh_mem, stream >>> #else #define KERNEL_ARGS2(grid, block) #define KERNEL_ARGS3(grid, block, sh_mem) #define KERNEL_ARGS4(grid, block, sh_mem, stream) #endif // Now launch your kernel using the appropriate macro: kernel KERNEL_ARGS2(dim3(nBlockCount), dim3(nThreadCount)) (param1);
I prefer this method because for some reason I always lose the '<<<' in my code, but the macro gets some help via syntax coloring :).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With