Setting outer variable from anonymous inner class

Question

Java doesn't know that doWork is going to be synchronous and that the stack frame that result is in will still be there. You need to alter something that isn't in the stack.

I think this would work

 final Long[] result = new Long[1];

and then

 result[0] = st.getLong(4);

in execute(). At the end, you need to return result[0];

This situation arises a lot in Java, and the cleanest way to handle it is with a simple value container class. It's the same type thing as the array approach, but it's cleaner IMO.

public class ValContainer<T> {
    private T val;

    public ValContainer() {
    }

    public ValContainer(T v) {
        this.val = v;
    }

    public T getVal() {
        return val;
    }

    public void setVal(T val) {
        this.val = val;
    }
}

Long is immutable. If you use a mutable class, holding a long value, you can change the value. For example:

public class Main {

public static void main( String[] args ) throws Exception {
    Main a = new Main();
    System.out.println( a.getNumber() );
}

public void doWork( Work work ) {
    work.doWork();
}


public Long getNumber() {
    final LongHolder result = new LongHolder();
    doWork( new Work() {
        public void doWork() {
            result.value = 1L;
        }
    } );
    return result.value;
}

private static class LongHolder { 
    public Long value; 
}

private static abstract class Work {
    public abstract void doWork();
}

}

You need a 'container' to hold your value. You, however, do not have to create a container class. You may use classes in the java.util.concurrent.atomic package. They provide an immutable wrapper for a value along with a set and a get method. You have AtomicInteger, AtomicBoolean, AtomicReference<V> (for your objects) e.t.c

In the outer method:

final AtomicLong resultHolder = new AtomicLong();

In the anonymous inner class method

long result = getMyLongValue();
resultHolder.set(result);

Later in your outer method

return resultHolder.get();

Here's an example.

public Long getNumber() {
   final AtomicLong resultHolder = new AtomicLong();
   Session session = new Session();
   session.doWork(new Work() {
       public void execute() {
           //Inside anonymous inner class
           long result = getMyLongValue();
           resultHolder.set(result);
       }
   });
   return resultHolder.get(); //Returns the value of result
}

If the containing class is MyClass -->

MyClass.this.variable = value;

Do not remember if this would work with a private variable (I think it would work).

Only works for attributes of the class (class variable). Does not work for method local variables. In JSE 7 probably there will be closures to do that kind of thing.

Anonymous classes/methods are not closures - this is exactly the difference.

The problem is that doWork() could create a new thread to call execute() and getNumber() could return before the result is set - and even more problematically: where should execute() write the result when the stack frame that contains the variable is gone? Languages with closures have to introduce a mechanism to keep such variables alive outside their original scope (or ensure that the closure is not executed in a separate thread).

A workaround:

Long[] result = new Long[1];
...
result[0] = st.getLong(4) ;
...
return result[0];

The standard solution to this is to return a value. See, for instance, ye olde java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged.

So the code would look something like this:

public Long getNumber(
    final String type, final String refNumber, final Long year
) throws ServiceException {
    try {
        Session session = PersistenceHelper.getSession();
        return session.doWork(new Work<Long>() {
            public Long execute(Connection conn) throws SQLException {
                CallableStatement st = conn.prepareCall("{ CALL PACKAGE.procedure(?, ?, ?, ?) }");
                try {
                    st.setString(1, type);
                    st.setString(2, refNumber);
                    st.setLong(3, year);
                    st.registerOutParameter(4, OracleTypes.NUMBER);
                    st.execute();
                    return st.getLong(4);
                } finally {
                    st.close();
                }
            }
        });
    } catch (Exception e) {
        throw ServiceException(e);
    }
}

(Also fixed the potential resource leak, and returning null for any error.)

Update: So apparently Work is from a third-party library and can't be altered. So I suggest not using it, at least isolate your application from so that you are not using it directly. Something like:

public interface WithConnection<T> {
    T execute(Connection connnection) throws SQLException;
}
public class SessionWrapper {
    private final Session session;
    public SessionWrapper(Session session) {
        session = nonnull(session);
    }
    public <T> T withConnection(final WithConnection<T> task) throws Service Exception {
        nonnull(task);
        return new Work() {
            T result;
            {
                session.doWork(this);
            }
            public void execute(Connection connection) throws SQLException {
                result = task.execute(connection);
            }
        }.result;
    }
}