I'm using visual studio 2010 which doesn't support <chrono>
, so I have to seed default_random_engine
. Thus, I've decided to seed it with rand
as following
srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
std::default_random_engine engine(rand());
std::normal_distribution<double> randn(0.0, 0.3);
instead of the following
unsigned seed = std::chrono::system_clock::now().time_since_epoch().count();
std::default_random_engine engine(seed);
std::normal_distribution<double> randn(0.0, 0.3);
I'm getting what I'm expecting to acquire for both methods. My question is are there any considerations should I pay attention to by using rand()? (Note: I have no choice to use <chrono>
I recommend grabbing a seed from std::random_device
:
std::default_random_engine engine(std::random_device{}());
which should provide you with significantly more entropy than std::time
.
According to http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/random/random_device/, they recommend that you don't use std::random_device
, as it isn't portable:
Notice that random devices may not always be available to produce random numbers (and in some systems, they may even never be available).
On a related page (http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/random/linear_congruential_engine/linear_congruential_engine/), they give the following as an example of creating a seed:
unsigned seed1 = std::chrono::system_clock::now().time_since_epoch().count();
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With