I've got a makefile (developed for gmake
on Linux) that I'm attempting to port to MacOS, but it seems like sed
doesn't want to cooperate. What I do is use GCC
to autogenerate dependency files, and then tweak them a bit using sed
. The relevant portion of the makefile
:
$(OBJ_DIR)/%.d: $(SRC_DIR)/%.cpp
$(CPPC) -MM -MD $< -o $@
sed -i 's|\(.*\)\.o:|$(OBJ_DIR)/\1.o $(OBJ_DIR)/\1.d $(TEST_OBJ_DIR)/\1_utest.o:|' $@
While this runs with no trouble under GNU/Linux, I get errors like the following when attempting to build on MacOS:
sed: 1: "test/obj/equipmentConta ...": undefined label 'est/obj/equipmentContainer_utest.d'
sed: 1: "test/obj/dice_utest.d": undefined label 'est/obj/dice_utest.d'
sed: 1: "test/obj/color-string_u ...": undefined label 'est/obj/color-string_utest.d'
It would seem like sed
is chopping off a character, but I can't see the solution.
OS X sed
handles the -i
argument differently to the Linux version.
You can generate a command that might "work" for both by adding -e
in this way:
# vv
sed -i -e 's|\(.*\)\.o:|$(OBJ_DIR)/\1.o $(OBJ_DIR)/\1.d $(TEST_OBJ_DIR)/\1_utest.o:|' $@
OS X sed -i
interprets the next thing after the -i
as a file extension for a backup copy of the in-place edit. (The Linux version only does this if there is no space between the -i
and the extension.) Obviously a side affect of using this is that you will get a backup file with -e
as an extension, which you may not want. Please refer to other answers to this question for more details, and cleaner approaches that can be used instead.
The behaviour you see is because OS X sed
consumes the s|||
as the extension (!) then interprets the next argument as a command - in this case it begins with t
, which sed
recognizes as a branch-to-label command expecting the target label as an argument - hence the error you see.
If you create a file test
you can reproduce the error:
$ sed -i 's|x|y|' test
sed: 1: "test": undefined label 'est'
Actually, doing
sed -i -e "s/blah/blah/" files
doesn't do what you expect in MacOS either. Instead it creates backup files with -e
extension.
The proper command for MacOS is
sed -i "" -e "s/blah/blah/" files
On Linux, remove the space between -i
and ""
(see related answer)
sed -i"" -e "s/blah/blah/" files
The currently accepted answer is flawed in two very important ways.
With BSD sed (the OSX version), the -e
option is interpreted as
a file extension and therefore creates a backup file with a -e
extension.
Testing for the darwin kernel as suggested is not a reliable approach to a cross platform solution since GNU or BSD sed could be present on any number of systems.
A much more reliable test would be to simply test for the --version
option which is only found in the GNU version of sed.
sed --version >/dev/null 2>&1
Once the correct version of sed is determined, we can then execute the command in its proper syntax.
GNU sed syntax for -i option:
sed -i -- "$@"
BSD sed syntax for -i option:
sed -i "" "$@"
Finally put it all together in a cross platform function to execute an in place edit sed commend:
sedi () {
sed --version >/dev/null 2>&1 && sed -i -- "$@" || sed -i "" "$@"
}
Example usage:
sedi 's/old/new/g' 'some_file.txt'
This solution has been tested on OSX, Ubuntu, Freebsd, Cygwin, CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise, & Msys.
martin clayton's helpful answer provides a good explanation of the problem[1], but his solution - as he states - has a potentially unwanted side effect.
Here are side-effect-free solutions:
Caveat: Solving the -i
syntax problem alone, as below, may not be enough, because there are many other differences between GNU sed
and BSD/macOS sed
(for a comprehensive discussion, see this answer of mine).
-i
: Create a backup file temporarily, then clean it up:With a non-empty suffix (backup-file filename extension) option-argument (a value that is not the empty string), you can use -i
in a way that works with both BSD/macOS sed
and GNU sed
, by directly appending the suffix to the -i
option.
This can be utilized to create a backup file temporarily that you can clean up right away:
sed -i.bak 's/foo/bar/' file && rm file.bak
Obviously, if you do want to keep the backup, simply omit the && rm file.bak
part.
mv
:If only a single file is to be edited in-place, the -i
option can be bypassed to avoid the incompatibility.
If you restrict your sed
script and other options to POSIX-compliant features, the following is a fully portable solution (note that -i
is not POSIX-compliant).
sed 's/foo/bar' file > /tmp/file.$$ && mv /tmp/file.$$ file
This command simply writes the modifications to a temporary file and, if the sed
command succeeds (&&
), replaces the original file with the temporary one.
mv
command that renames the original first.Caveat: Fundamentally, this is what -i
does too, except that it tries to preserve permissions and extended attributes (macOS) of the original file; however, if the original file is a symlink, both this solution and -i
will replace the symlink with a regular file.
See the bottom half of this answer of mine for details on how -i
works.
[1] For a more in-depth explanation, see this answer of mine.
This isn't quite an answer to the question, but one can get linux-equivalent behavior through
brew install gnu-sed
# Add to .bashrc / .zshrc
export PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnu-sed/libexec/gnubin:$PATH"
(previously there was a --with-default-names
option to brew install gnu-sed
but that has recently been removed)
I came across this issue as well and thought of the following solution:
darwin=false;
case "`uname`" in
Darwin*) darwin=true ;;
esac
if $darwin; then
sedi="/usr/bin/sed -i ''"
else
sedi="sed -i"
fi
$sedi 's/foo/bar/' /home/foobar/bar
Works for me ;-), YMMV
I work in a multi-OS team where ppl build on Windows, Linux and OS X. Some OS X users complained because they got another error - they had the GNU port of sed installed so I had to specify the full path.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With