Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Run @Scheduled task only on one WebLogic cluster node?

We are running a Spring 3.0.x web application (.war) with a nightly @Scheduled job in a clustered WebLogic 10.3.4 environment. However, as the application is deployed to each node (using the deployment wizard in the AdminServer's web console), the job is started on each node every night thus running multiple times concurrently.

How can we prevent this from happening?

I know that libraries like Quartz allow coordinating jobs inside clustered environment by means of a database lock table or I could even implement something like this myself. But since this seems to be a fairly common scenario I wonder if Spring does not already come with an option how to easily circumvent this problem without having to add new libraries to my project or putting in manual workarounds.

  • We are not able to upgrade to Spring 3.1 with configuration profiles, as mentioned here

Please let me know if there are any open questions. I also asked this question on the Spring Community forums. Thanks a lot for your help.

like image 517
Axel Knauf Avatar asked Jan 16 '12 11:01

Axel Knauf


3 Answers

We only have one task that send a daily summary email. To avoid extra dependencies, we simply check whether the hostname of each node corresponds with a configured system property.

private boolean isTriggerNode() {
   String triggerHostmame = System.getProperty("trigger.hostname");;
   String hostName = InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostName();
   return hostName.equals(triggerHostmame);
}

public void execute() {
   if (isTriggerNode()) {
      //send email
   }
}
like image 165
jalogar Avatar answered Nov 06 '22 02:11

jalogar


We are implementing our own synchronization logic using a shared lock table inside the application database. This allows all cluster nodes to check if a job is already running before actually starting it itself.

like image 32
Axel Knauf Avatar answered Nov 06 '22 04:11

Axel Knauf


Be careful, since in the solution of implementing your own synchronization logic using a shared lock table, you always have the concurrency issue where the two cluster nodes are reading/writing from the table at the same time.

Best is to perform the following steps in one db transaction: - read the value in the shared lock table - if no other node is having the lock, take the lock - update the table indicating you take the lock

like image 3
Mathias G. Avatar answered Nov 06 '22 04:11

Mathias G.