I am asked to reverse a which takes head as parameter where as head is a linked list e.g.: 1 -> 2 -> 3 which was returned from a function already defined I tried to implement the function reverse_linked_list in this way:
def reverse_linked_list(head):
temp = head
head = None
temp1 = temp.next
temp2 = temp1.next
temp1.next = None
temp2.next = temp1
temp1.next = temp
return temp2
class Node(object):
def __init__(self,value=None):
self.value = value
self.next = None
def to_linked_list(plist):
head = None
prev = None
for element in plist:
node = Node(element)
if not head:
head = node
else:
prev.next = node
prev = node
return head
def from_linked_list(head):
result = []
counter = 0
while head and counter < 100: # tests don't use more than 100 nodes, so bail if you loop 100 times.
result.append(head.value)
head = head.next
counter += 1
return result
def check_reversal(input):
head = to_linked_list(input)
result = reverse_linked_list(head)
assert list(reversed(input)) == from_linked_list(result)
It is called in this way: check_reversal([1,2,3])
. The function I have written for reversing the list is giving [3,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1]
and works only for a list of length 3. How can I generalize it for a list of length n
?
The accepted answer doesn't make any sense to me, since it refers to a bunch of stuff that doesn't seem to exist (number
, node
, len
as a number rather than a function). Since the homework assignment this was for is probably long past, I'll post what I think is the most effective code.
This is for doing a destructive reversal, where you modify the existing list nodes:
def reverse_list(head):
new_head = None
while head:
head.next, head, new_head = new_head, head.next, head # look Ma, no temp vars!
return new_head
A less fancy implementation of the function would use one temporary variable and several assignment statements, which may be a bit easier to understand:
def reverse_list(head):
new_head = None # this is where we build the reversed list (reusing the existing nodes)
while head:
temp = head # temp is a reference to a node we're moving from one list to the other
head = temp.next # the first two assignments pop the node off the front of the list
temp.next = new_head # the next two make it the new head of the reversed list
new_head = temp
return new_head
An alternative design would be to create an entirely new list without changing the old one. This would be more appropriate if you want to treat the list nodes as immutable objects:
class Node(object):
def __init__(self, value, next=None): # if we're considering Nodes to be immutable
self.value = value # we need to set all their attributes up
self.next = next # front, since we can't change them later
def reverse_list_nondestructive(head):
new_head = None
while head:
new_head = Node(head.value, new_head)
head = head.next
return new_head
I found blckknght's answer useful and it's certainly correct, but I struggled to understand what was actually happening, due mainly to Python's syntax allowing two variables to be swapped on one line. I also found the variable names a little confusing.
In this example I use previous, current, tmp
.
def reverse(head):
current = head
previous = None
while current:
tmp = current.next
current.next = previous # None, first time round.
previous = current # Used in the next iteration.
current = tmp # Move to next node.
head = previous
Taking a singly linked list with 3 nodes (head = n1
, tail = n3
) as an example.
n1 -> n2 -> n3
Before entering the while
loop for the first time, previous
is initialized to None
because there is no node before the head (n1
).
I found it useful to imagine the variables previous, current, tmp
'moving along' the linked list, always in that order.
First iteration
previous = None
[n1] -> [n2] -> [n3]
current tmp
current.next = previous
Second iteration
[n1] -> [n2] -> [n3]
previous current tmp
current.next = previous
Third iteration
# next is None
[n1] -> [n2] -> [n3]
previous current
current.next = previous
Since the while
loop exits when current == None
the new head of the list must be set to previous
which is the last node we visited.
Edited
Adding a full working example in Python (with comments and useful str
representations). I'm using tmp
rather than next
because next
is a keyword. However I happen to think it's a better name and makes the algorithm clearer.
class Node:
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
self.next = None
def __str__(self):
return str(self.value)
def set_next(self, value):
self.next = Node(value)
return self.next
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self, head=None):
self.head = head
def __str__(self):
values = []
current = self.head
while current:
values.append(str(current))
current = current.next
return ' -> '.join(values)
def reverse(self):
previous = None
current = self.head
while current.next:
# Remember `next`, we'll need it later.
tmp = current.next
# Reverse the direction of two items.
current.next = previous
# Move along the list.
previous = current
current = tmp
# The loop exited ahead of the last item because it has no
# `next` node. Fix that here.
current.next = previous
# Don't forget to update the `LinkedList`.
self.head = current
if __name__ == "__main__":
head = Node('a')
head.set_next('b').set_next('c').set_next('d').set_next('e')
ll = LinkedList(head)
print(ll)
ll.revevse()
print(ll)
Results
a -> b -> c -> d -> e
e -> d -> c -> b -> a
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With