I'm trying to write a regex function that will identify and replace a single instance of a match within a string without affecting the other instances. For example, I have this string:
12||34||56
I want to replace the second set of pipes with ampersands to get this string:
12||34&&56
The regex function needs to be able to handle x amount of pipes and allow me to replace the nth set of pipes, so I could use the same function to make these replacements:
23||45||45||56||67 -> 23&&45||45||56||67 23||34||98||87 -> 23||34||98&&87
I know that I could just split/replace/concat the string at the pipes, and I also know that I can match on /\|\|/
and iterate through the resulting array, but I'm interested to know if it's possible to write a single expression that can do this. Note that this would be for Javascript, so it's possible to generate a regex at runtime using eval()
, but it's not possible to use any Perl-specific regex instructions.
How to use RegEx with . replace in JavaScript. To use RegEx, the first argument of replace will be replaced with regex syntax, for example /regex/ . This syntax serves as a pattern where any parts of the string that match it will be replaced with the new substring.
For example, the replacement pattern $1 indicates that the matched substring is to be replaced by the first captured group.
In your specific example, the $1 will be the group (^| ) which is "position of the start of string (zero-width), or a single space character". So by replacing the whole expression with that, you're basically removing the variable theClass and potentially a space after it.
I came across this question and, although the title is very general, the accepted answer handles only the question's specific use case.
I needed a more general-purpose solution, so I wrote one and thought I'd share it here.
This function requires that you pass it the following arguments:
original
: the string you're searching inpattern
: either a string to search for, or a RegExp with a capture group. Without a capture group, it will throw an error. This is because the function calls split
on the original string, and only if the supplied RegExp contains a capture group will the resulting array contain the matches.n
: the ordinal occurrence to find; eg, if you want the 2nd match, pass in 2
replace
: Either a string to replace the match with, or a function which will take in the match and return a replacement string.// Pipe examples like the OP's replaceNthMatch("12||34||56", /(\|\|)/, 2, '&&') // "12||34&&56" replaceNthMatch("23||45||45||56||67", /(\|\|)/, 1, '&&') // "23&&45||45||56||67" // Replace groups of digits replaceNthMatch("foo-1-bar-23-stuff-45", /(\d+)/, 3, 'NEW') // "foo-1-bar-23-stuff-NEW" // Search value can be a string replaceNthMatch("foo-stuff-foo-stuff-foo", "foo", 2, 'bar') // "foo-stuff-bar-stuff-foo" // No change if there is no match for the search replaceNthMatch("hello-world", "goodbye", 2, "adios") // "hello-world" // No change if there is no Nth match for the search replaceNthMatch("foo-1-bar-23-stuff-45", /(\d+)/, 6, 'NEW') // "foo-1-bar-23-stuff-45" // Passing in a function to make the replacement replaceNthMatch("foo-1-bar-23-stuff-45", /(\d+)/, 2, function(val){ //increment the given value return parseInt(val, 10) + 1; }); // "foo-1-bar-24-stuff-45"
var replaceNthMatch = function (original, pattern, n, replace) { var parts, tempParts; if (pattern.constructor === RegExp) { // If there's no match, bail if (original.search(pattern) === -1) { return original; } // Every other item should be a matched capture group; // between will be non-matching portions of the substring parts = original.split(pattern); // If there was a capture group, index 1 will be // an item that matches the RegExp if (parts[1].search(pattern) !== 0) { throw {name: "ArgumentError", message: "RegExp must have a capture group"}; } } else if (pattern.constructor === String) { parts = original.split(pattern); // Need every other item to be the matched string tempParts = []; for (var i=0; i < parts.length; i++) { tempParts.push(parts[i]); // Insert between, but don't tack one onto the end if (i < parts.length - 1) { tempParts.push(pattern); } } parts = tempParts; } else { throw {name: "ArgumentError", message: "Must provide either a RegExp or String"}; } // Parens are unnecessary, but explicit. :) indexOfNthMatch = (n * 2) - 1; if (parts[indexOfNthMatch] === undefined) { // There IS no Nth match return original; } if (typeof(replace) === "function") { // Call it. After this, we don't need it anymore. replace = replace(parts[indexOfNthMatch]); } // Update our parts array with the new value parts[indexOfNthMatch] = replace; // Put it back together and return return parts.join(''); }
The least appealing part of this function is that it takes 4 arguments. It could be simplified to need only 3 arguments by adding it as a method to the String prototype, like this:
String.prototype.replaceNthMatch = function(pattern, n, replace) { // Same code as above, replacing "original" with "this" };
If you do that, you can call the method on any string, like this:
"foo-bar-foo".replaceNthMatch("foo", 2, "baz"); // "foo-bar-baz"
The following are the Jasmine tests that this function passes.
describe("replaceNthMatch", function() { describe("when there is no match", function() { it("should return the unmodified original string", function() { var str = replaceNthMatch("hello-there", /(\d+)/, 3, 'NEW'); expect(str).toEqual("hello-there"); }); }); describe("when there is no Nth match", function() { it("should return the unmodified original string", function() { var str = replaceNthMatch("blah45stuff68hey", /(\d+)/, 3, 'NEW'); expect(str).toEqual("blah45stuff68hey"); }); }); describe("when the search argument is a RegExp", function() { describe("when it has a capture group", function () { it("should replace correctly when the match is in the middle", function(){ var str = replaceNthMatch("this_937_thing_38_has_21_numbers", /(\d+)/, 2, 'NEW'); expect(str).toEqual("this_937_thing_NEW_has_21_numbers"); }); it("should replace correctly when the match is at the beginning", function(){ var str = replaceNthMatch("123_this_937_thing_38_has_21_numbers", /(\d+)/, 2, 'NEW'); expect(str).toEqual("123_this_NEW_thing_38_has_21_numbers"); }); }); describe("when it has no capture group", function() { it("should throw an error", function(){ expect(function(){ replaceNthMatch("one_1_two_2", /\d+/, 2, 'NEW'); }).toThrow('RegExp must have a capture group'); }); }); }); describe("when the search argument is a string", function() { it("should should match and replace correctly", function(){ var str = replaceNthMatch("blah45stuff68hey", 'stuff', 1, 'NEW'); expect(str).toEqual("blah45NEW68hey"); }); }); describe("when the replacement argument is a function", function() { it("should call it on the Nth match and replace with the return value", function(){ // Look for the second number surrounded by brackets var str = replaceNthMatch("foo[1][2]", /(\[\d+\])/, 2, function(val) { // Get the number without the [ and ] var number = val.slice(1,-1); // Add 1 number = parseInt(number,10) + 1; // Re-format and return return '[' + number + ']'; }); expect(str).toEqual("foo[1][3]"); }); }); });
This code may fail in IE7 because that browser incorrectly splits strings using a regex, as discussed here. [shakes fist at IE7]. I believe that this is the solution; if you need to support IE7, good luck. :)
here's something that works:
"23||45||45||56||67".replace(/^((?:[0-9]+\|\|){n})([0-9]+)\|\|/,"$1$2&&")
where n is the one less than the nth pipe, (of course you don't need that first subexpression if n = 0)
And if you'd like a function to do this:
function pipe_replace(str,n) { var RE = new RegExp("^((?:[0-9]+\\|\\|){" + (n-1) + "})([0-9]+)\|\|"); return str.replace(RE,"$1$2&&"); }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With