First things first: Neither this, this, this nor this answered my question. So I'll open a new one.
Okay okay. I know that regexes are not the way to parse general HTML. Please take note that the created documents are written using a limited, controlled HTML subset. And people writing the docs know what they're doing. They are all IT professionals!
Given the controlled syntax it is possible to parse the documents I have here using regexes.
I am not trying to download arbitrary documents from the web and parse them!
And if the parsing does fail, the document is edited, so it'll parse. The problem I am addressing here is more general than that (i.e. not replace patterns inside two other patterns).
In our office we are supposed to "pretty print" our documentation. Hence why some came up with putting it all into Word documents. So far we're thankfully not quite there yet. And, if I get this done, we might not need to.
The main part of the docs are stored in a TikiWiki database. I've created a daft PHP script which converts the documents from HTML (via LaTeX) to PDF. One of the must have features of the selected Wiki-System was a WYSIWYG editor. Which, as expected leaves us with documents with a less then formal DOM.
Consequently, I am transliterating the document using "simple" regexes. It all works (mostly) fine so far, but I encountered one problem I haven't figured out on my own yet.
Some special characters need to replaced by LaTeX markup. For exaple, the \
character should be replaced by $\backslash$
(unless someone knows another solution?).
Except while in a verbatim
block!
I do replace <code>
tags with verbatim
sections. But if this code
block contains backslashes (as is the case for Windows folder names), the script still replaces these backslashes.
I reckon I could solve this using negative LookBehinds and/or LookAheads. But my attempts did not work.
Granted, I would be better off with a real parser. In fact, it is something on my "in-brain-roadmap", but it is currently out of the scope. The script works well enough for our limited knowledge domain. Creating a parser would require me to start pretty much from scratch.
The Hello \ World document is located in:
<code>C:\documents\hello_world.txt</code>
The Hello $\backslash$ World document is located in:
\begin{verbatim}C:\documents\hello_world.txt\end{verbatim}
This is the best I could come up with so far:
<?php
$patterns = array(
"special_chars2" => array( '/(?<!<code[^>]*>.*)\\\\[^$](?!.*<\/code>)/U', '$\\backslash$'),
);
foreach( $patterns as $name => $p ){
$tex_input = preg_replace( $p[0], $p[1], $tex_input );
}
?>
Note that this is only an excerpt, and the [^$]
is another LaTeX requirement.
Another attempt which seemed to work:
<?php
$patterns = array(
"special_chars2" => array( '/\\\\[^$](?!.*<\/code>)/U', '$\\backslash$'),
);
foreach( $patterns as $name => $p ){
$tex_input = preg_replace( $p[0], $p[1], $tex_input );
}
?>
... in other words: leaving out the negative lookbehind.
But this looks more error-prone than with both lookbehind and lookahead.
As you may have noticed, the pattern is ungreedy (/.../U
). So will this match only as little possible inside a <code>
block? Considering the look-arounds?
If me, I will try to find HTML parser and will do with that.
Another option is will try to chunk the string into <code>.*?</code>
and other parts.
and will update other parts, and will recombine it.
$x="The Hello \ World document is located in:\n<br>
<code>C:\documents\hello_world.txt</code>";
$r=preg_split("/(<code>.*?<\/code>)/", $x,-1,PREG_SPLIT_DELIM_CAPTURE);
for($i=0;$i<count($r);$i+=2)
$r[$i]=str_replace("\\","$\\backslash$",$r[$i]);
$x=implode($r);
echo $x;
Here is the results.
The Hello $\backslash$ World document is located in:
C:\documents\hello_world.txt
Sorry, If my approach is not suitable for you.
I reckon I could solve this using negative LookBehinds and/or LookAheads.
You reckon wrong. Regular expressions are not a replacement for a parser.
I would suggest that you pipe the html through htmltidy, then read it with a dom-parser and then transform the dom to your target output format. Is there anything preventing your from taking this route?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With